up-into-the-air Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 The web site, righttoknow.org.au is the place and takes requests for "public inquiries". FOI requests are on this link. The metadata FOI is on the Attorney General's Department: https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/requests_for_access_to_telecommu#incoming-4356 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 within CASA an FOI is a Flight Operations Inspector. Nev 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Checked. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Check it out before you write creative Robbo. Nev Oh No !!!! I have fallen Victim !! Fixed ! Sorry...... Long day..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 These all want access.. 1. Australian Financial Security Authority, Commonwealth 2. Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA), Commonwealth 3. Australian Postal Corporation, Commonwealth 4. Australian Taxation Office, Commonwealth 5. Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre, Commonwealth 6. Civil Aviation, Safety Authority (CASA), Commonwealth 7. Clean Energy Regulator, Commonwealth 8. Department of Agriculture, Commonwealth 9. Department of Defence (ADFIS and IGD), Commonwealth 10. Department of the Environment, Commonwealth 11. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Commonwealth 12. Department of Health, Commonwealth 13. Department of Human Services, Commonwealth 14. Department of Social Services, Commonwealth 15. Fair Work Building and Construction, Commonwealth 16. National Measurement Institute, Commonwealth 17. ACT Revenue Office, ACT 18. Access Canberra (Department of Treasury and Economic Development), ACT 19. Bankstown City Council, NSW 20. Consumer Affairs, VIC 21. Consumer, Building and Occupational Services (Consumer Affairs and Fair Trading – Department of Justice), TAS 22. Consumer and Business Services, SA 23. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, QLD 24. Department of Commerce, WA 25. Department of Corrective Services, WA 26. Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, QLD 27. Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport & Resources (Fisheries), VIC 28. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, VIC 29. Department of Environment Regulation, WA 30. Department of Fisheries, WA 31. Department of Justice and Regulation (Consumer Affairs), VIC 32. Department of Justice and Regulation (Sheriff of Victoria), VIC 33. Department of Mines and Petroleum, WA 34. Department of Primary Industries (Fisheries), NSW 35. Environment Protection Authority, SA 36. Greyhound Racing Victoria, VIC 37. Harness Racing New South Wales, NSW 38. Health Care Complaints Commission, NSW 39. Legal Services Board, VIC 40. NSW Environment Protection Authority, NSW 41. NSW Fair Trading, NSW 42. Office of Environment & Heritage, NSW 43. Office of Fair Trading (Department of Justice And Attorney-General Office of the Director General), QLD 44. Office of State Revenue, NSW 45. Office of State Revenue, QLD 46. Office of the Racing Integrity Commissioner, VIC 47. Primary Industries and Regions South Australia (PIRSA), SA 48. Queensland Building and Construction Commission, QLD 49. Racing and Wagering Western Australia, WA 50. Racing NSW, NSW 51. Racing Queensland, QLD 52. Roads and Maritime Services NSW, NSW 53. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), VIC 54. State Revenue Office, VIC 55. Taxi Services Commission, VIC 56. RevenueSA, SA 57. Victorian WorkSafe Authority, VIC http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/dozens-of-government-agencies-request-access-to-citizen-metadata-without-warrants-20160119-gm8uql.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaz3g Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Not one of those agencies has such an urgent or pressing need for access that they can't take the time and care to apply for a warrant. To obtain a warrant they have to convince a judge that they have reasonable grounds to believe an offence has been or is being committed and a warrant to breach privacy is justified in the circumstances. That's a reasonable protection of liberties balancing rights with obligations and a need to know. Kaz 2 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly_tornado Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 You will think twice about criticizing the government now that they can track your friends and family 24/7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabiru7252 Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Well, I had a friend who refused to have his kids vaccinated (way back in the 70s) and even had them born at home because he believed that 'The Government' was collecting blood samples etc. for some yet to happen event or experiment. Google (and others) collect brazillians of giga-bytes of data on each of us yet we happily use the internet in ignorant bliss (well, most of us). I still say for everything they know about YOU there's probably ten things they don't know. I just wish they could get their data-analysis right. I have NEVER been on a dating site or trolled for sex yet I get some trollop, three kilometers down the road pop up on my screen saying she wants to (sounds like duck) me. Or, how some silly old fool has the best abs in the world for his age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Oh well, I have nothing to hide so I couldent give a .... They would be preety bored with my meta data. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Well, I had a friend who refused to have his kids vaccinated (way back in the 70s) and even had them born at home because he believed that 'The Government' was collecting blood samples etc. for some yet to happen event or experiment. Google (and others) collect brazillians of giga-bytes of data on each of us yet we happily use the internet in ignorant bliss (well, most of us). I still say for everything they know about YOU there's probably ten things they don't know. I just wish they could get their data-analysis right. I have NEVER been on a dating site or trolled for sex yet I get some trollop, three kilometers down the road pop up on my screen saying she wants to (sounds like duck) me. Or, how some silly old fool has the best abs in the world for his age. I seem to be told I can extend my man hood with some secret potion according to a popup. Hmmm one can only hope :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabiru7252 Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Oh well, I have nothing to hide so I couldent give a ....They would be preety bored with my meta data. It's when they get it wrong and you're dragged off screaming and naked into the night after being accused of some heinous internet crime you never committed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabiru7252 Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 I seem to be told I can extend my man hood with some secret potion according to a popup.Hmmm one can only hope :) Doesn't work:oops: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Doesn't work:oops: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDQDI Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 It's when they get it wrong and you're dragged off screaming and naked into the night after being accused of some heinous internet crime you never committed. Can you fellas talk about something else!!!!!!! I just googled "naked and screaming" and this thread popped up:throw pc: you are making my searches less efficient. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 I just googled "naked and screaming" I don't think I am the only one with to much time on my hands. Hmmm I actually googled that and I get Yogi Bear lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly_tornado Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 why you never report any crimes, what a nightmare Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
up-into-the-air Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 While we are at it, have a look at the new proposal by #casa for CAR 234. (3) The pilot in command of an aircraft for a flight commits an offence of strict liability if: (a) the pilot is subject to a requirement under the instrument made for the purposes of subregulation (1) in relation to the flight; and (b) the pilot does not comply with the requirement in relation to the flight. Penalty: 50 penalty units. (4) The operator of an aircraft commits an offence of strict liability if: (a) the operator is subject to a requirement under the instrument made for the purposes of subregulation (1) in relation to a flight of the aircraft; and (b) the operator does not comply with the requirement in relation to the flight. Penalty: 50 penalty units. Now this is serious, a fine of over $100/ penalty unit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly_tornado Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 $5000 fine? How are they going to prosecute that? Why are they going to prosecute that? CASA employees dreaming up ways to qualify for promotions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 They must be getting a %. What a ridiculous situation. Why would a sane person fly an aeroplane for fun in this country? Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly_tornado Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Imagine the scenario when a family is involved in a plane crash and the family members has to give evidence against the relative piloting the plane to satisfy CASA's thirst for prosecutions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
up-into-the-air Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 You have the current Jack Pantovic situation already. More information on CAR 234 changes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaz3g Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 While we are at it, have a look at the new proposal by #casa for CAR 234.(3) The pilot in command of an aircraft for a flight commits an offence of strict liability if: (a) the pilot is subject to a requirement under the instrument made for the purposes of subregulation (1) in relation to the flight; and (b) the pilot does not comply with the requirement in relation to the flight. Penalty: 50 penalty units. (4) The operator of an aircraft commits an offence of strict liability if: (a) the operator is subject to a requirement under the instrument made for the purposes of subregulation (1) in relation to a flight of the aircraft; and (b) the operator does not comply with the requirement in relation to the flight. Penalty: 50 penalty units. Now this is serious, a fine of over $100/ penalty unit The value of a penalty unit is currently $180 http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca191482/s4aa.html That makes it a $9000 fine. Kaz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnarly Gnu Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 In countries like China and India there is deep behind-the-scenes government corruption. Here in Australia it is up front, in the open legalized government theft. And more expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnm Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 $ 180 per point is a bit cheap ................. why not make it a round $ 200 per point ? and be done with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turboplanner Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 They'll get there. I can remember when it was only $100. There are plenty of $40,000 plus strict liability fines already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now