Romeo Juliet Whiskey Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Hey guys, can any of you point me towards the legislation regarding the mounting of gopro cameras inside and outside of the cockpit. Couldn't find any info on the CASA website regarding this. Thanks, Rich 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 There was some discussion back here: http://www.recreationalflying.com/threads/do-you-need-approval-by-anyone-in-australia.140018/#post-519951 CASA class it as a modification needing approval in accordance with their normal approval process. It isnt user friendly. It is described for all modifications here: https://www.casa.gov.au/file/151936/download?token=MSIynbVt They have this draft AC but it is still a draft. https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net351/f/_assets/main/lib100227/draftac23-1-0.pdf Edit: If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is around.... You asked for the rules, What CASA doesn't know about cant hurt anybody... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shags_j Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Till you land and get ramp checked... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Juliet Whiskey Posted April 30, 2016 Author Share Posted April 30, 2016 I presume from a legal standpoint it's OK to mount gopros inside the cockpit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happyflyer Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 FWIW, my understanding is that nothing permanent can be mounted inside without an engineering order. Temporary mounts such as suction cups are okay as long as they are not there for take off and landing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Personally, I wouldn't use suction mounts, they too easily become loose and become missiles in the cockpit, and why risk damaging your camera. The bolt down ones are better, make sure they do not impede the view or interfere with any of the aircraft controls... I generally let my passenger be in charge of the camera operation whilst I get on with the job of flying the plane. If I'm alone, I set it up, start it up, and get on with the job of flying and forget about it until after shutdown. I know this is about legislation, but that's my common sense two cents worth put in. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalph Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 What CASA doesn't know about cant hurt anybody... Till you land and get ramp checked... Or until you post the video on You-Tube and become your very own witness for the prosecution... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howard Hughes Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Or until you post the video on You-Tube and become your very own witness for the prosecution... "my back seat passenger was holding the camera your honour", "what do you mean I don't have a back seat, well who was holding it then" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernie Knight Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 I'm not sure if the question should be 'has anyone been written up or spoken to by CASAaa for using a GoPro? I've seen mounts on wings, dash combing and all sorts of places - even on helmets. I've never seen or heard of anyone being spoken to about them. That could be that internal mounted ones are quickly removed in time before being seen .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 A lot of commercial joyflight operators have gone through the approval process at great expense. For them it makes business sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 They should be encouraged. When you stuff it up you have your own black box to throw light on your predicament, and we all get to know what happened. Nev 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djpacro Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 .... I've never seen or heard of anyone being spoken to about them. That could be that internal mounted ones are quickly removed in time before being seen .. One of my friends was questioned by a couple of CASA guys as they checked the aeroplane after seeing a video on YouTube. No problems when told the camera was internal and nil evidence of an external installation. It seems to me that they have a firm policy on external installations per that AC 23-1 (issued some time ago, so not a draft). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alouis Posted May 2, 2016 Share Posted May 2, 2016 To be honest, its an entirely new thing to me. My concern is will it affect the weight and balancing sys of the Aircraft? I believe it will not, whatever. Please sent me the CASA GO PRO draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalph Posted May 2, 2016 Share Posted May 2, 2016 Some very interesting information in the link below. I would be VERY cautious about mounting a camera anywhere in the airstream that might affect airflow over control surfaces Some people seem to stick the cameras anywhere, giving more consideration to the shot that to the possible effect on the flying qualities of the aircraft. One poster in the link below noted an eight knot increase in his plane's stall speed when he fitted a camera to his wing! For sensible external placement have a look at the FlightChops videos on You-Tube. http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=888927&highlight=camera 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted March 12, 2017 Share Posted March 12, 2017 Of course you could fit them in the wrong place but compared to the venturi's, wind driven generators, pitot heads rear vision mirrors, Ram air turbines Geophysical mapping devices, Camera's, Flying with doors off a go pro or two is small bickies in the big scheme of things. (Not to mention fixed undercarriages, engine mufflers, radiators, struts and junk hanging off many planes in the design). Nev 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalph Posted March 12, 2017 Share Posted March 12, 2017 Of course you could fit them in the wrong place but compared to the venturi's, wind driven generators, pitot heads rear vision mirrors, Ram air turbines Geophysical mapping devices, Camera's, Flying with doors off a go pro or two is small bickies in the big scheme of things. (Not to mention fixed undercarriages, engine mufflers, radiators, struts and junk hanging off many planes in the design). Nev True Nev, but all of those external excrescences you mentioned would (or should) have been fitted when the aircraft was being built and their effects taken into account when the plane was in the test flight phase. Fitting extra bits & pieces out in the airstream means that the pilot becomes a test pilot. Maybe the worst thing that happens is that a small change to the POH might be needed, or maybe not. The problem is that no one knows what effect the extras might have until the next flight after fitting them. There have been a few cases where people have fitted, for example, vortex generators because "they are supposed to work", and found that their plane behaved differently. Not all of them were pleasantly surprised. Lots of people fit Go Pro's with no apparent ill effects. It's a suck it and see sort of exercise, but if it were me I would be very tentative flying until I had checked out the plane's performance at all edges of the flight envelope. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geoffreywh Posted March 12, 2017 Share Posted March 12, 2017 I think the pilot in the VANS article mentioned above was really pushing the envelope when mounting a camera on the wing near the leading edge. Mount away from the wing please. On the wheel spat ? Great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yenn Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 I don't know what a go pro weighs, but with a heavy mounting on a light plane with a long distance from centre of mass to the camera I would personally check the W & B. Sticking it out on a wing tip could also lead to excess drag on one side. Just be careful and think it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geoffreywh Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 weighs about 3 feathers, no effect. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red750 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 cscotthendry produces some great videos. He may be able to give a few tips. Also check out the CASA Out-n-Back video series. They use numerous cameras mounted outside and inside the aircraft. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cscotthendry Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 I obtained approval from the manufacturer for the type and position of my GoPro mounts. I used the surfboard mounts rather than the standard GoPro mounts as they have a larger adhesive area. I usually have one camera mounted on one of the stick on mounts under the wing, and one mounted on a strap on mount on the opposite strut. I have never experienced any interference with the control surfaces or the aerodynamics of the airplane (no change in stall speed, or drag imbalance). That said, I would never mount anything on the top of the wing because of the disturbance to the lifting airflow. If you fly a GA aircraft, I would definitely advise going through the CASA approval process to mount external cameras and not post any video online unless you have done that. RA Aus has a (soft) policy of actually encouraging us to have cameras as it might help investigators in case of accident. I'm not sure if it is in black and white, but I have read references to it in Sport Pilot. Also, if you fly an LSA, anything you do to the aircraft by way of modifications requires approval. So be careful about that. Finally, FWIW, don't be stupid about flying videos. Don't post footage of yourself deliberately breaking rules or doing dangerous flying. It WILL get you into trouble and it will bring attention to the rest of us. There's lots of legal stuff to video and we are privileged to see the world the way few others get to see it. Post your videos, I love to watch them all. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Gandalph, Vortex generators are a " major"player in how the airflow behaves. The order of potential effect of a minor thing like a go pro camera is not really comparable. OK.. generally all things should be verified as to their potential effect with an aeroplane. One of my sons wears one (go pro camera) when he races his motorbike. It's not even noticeable on his helmet. A wingtip clearance light lens broken would make more difference... Casa could cover this with a simplelist of limits and rules suggested. It should not be a big deal... As I've said previously.... These things are helpful for the individual pilot and all of us potentially, to analyse events, not cause them. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now