Jump to content

Leak down tester for 912 Rotax


Recommended Posts

You can buy a  cheap one online and convert it to the Rotax 1mm orifice,  using a dab of epoxy, drilled out with a 1 mm bit - simples!

 

Related point: Both the cylinder leak down test and the compression test  (I advocate both) are relative ie your first test(s) when the engine new (ish) will provide a "baseline"  for future testing.  With the exception of very worn/damaged engines, one off testing has little diagnostic benefit - bit like suddenly deciding to have the crankcase oil test.

Edited by skippydiesel
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use a common automotive compression tester (dynamic). Leak-down tests might have been the "standard" in the industry for 100 years but the dynamic compression test is more accurate (less low end results) and should be used as the primary test.

 

Leak-down is useful to determine the location of the leak, but then you don't need the tester set-up, just the spark plug adaptor (old spark plug), solder a hose barb fitting on, add a short section of hose and an air line fitting (male). Then plug it in to your air supply through a pressure regulator.

 

The Toledo (and ToolPro) brands doesn't specify the orifice size. They are more than likely around the 1mm mark. If you need it, I can see if I can measure mine. They are available from Supercheap & Repco, most likely also from Bursons etc.

392419.pdf

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just checked my automotive leak down tester (similar to the Toledo/ToolPro), it has a 1.5mm drilling in the body. To make it relevant to the aviation test, I would need to drill that out and put in a 1mm bush/jet.

Also read this: https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2023/july/pilot/savvy-maintenance-unbelievable-compression

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The length of the orifice is also important. 

 

 The differential pressure tester is designed to check the compression of aircraft engines by measuring the leakage through the cylinders caused by worn or damaged components. (1) For an engine cylinder having less than a 5.00-inch bore; 0.040-inch orifice diameter; . 250 inch long; and a 60-degree approach angle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

same as the one I have. Remove the regulator, drill out the hole, make a suitable orifice (0.040" dia x 1/4" long) and insert to meet the FAA spec. The existing 1.5mm hole will give you good results, though🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clear Prop also has another version and currently in stock which is cheaper as well:

 

WWW.CLEARPROP.COM.AU

Heavy duty cylinder leak-down tester Features This automotive compression tester works with most car models and gasoline engines...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/1/2024 at 12:42 PM, BillLipson said:

Looking for recommendations for for where I can obtain a reasonably priced leak down tester in Australia. Must have the recommended 1mm orifice.

Look at the features on the E2A-1000 at Aircraft spruce, I have that one and made a 1/2” by about 300 mm pipe rather than the flexible hose connection into the spark plug thread in head. Works a treat.  I recommend the need for the valve after the gauge for available pressure so you can turn on to get slight flow of air to confirm at TDC on compression stroke.  Then open for full pressure adjusted for 80 psi or maybe 87 your choice. Such worth the extra bit of money.

Edited by Blueadventures
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Admin said:

Clear Prop also has another version and currently in stock which is cheaper as well:

 

WWW.CLEARPROP.COM.AU

Heavy duty cylinder leak-down tester Features This automotive compression tester works with most car models and gasoline engines...

 

This is the compression tester, not leak-down

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pluessy said:

This is the compression tester, not leak-down

Sorry, thanks @pluessy I forgot the question was about Leak Down. Just trying to promote the Clear Prop Shop as it is Clear Prop that makes this site available free for everyone

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/01/2024 at 12:41 PM, pluessy said:

same as the one I have. Remove the regulator, drill out the hole, make a suitable orifice (0.040" dia x 1/4" long) and insert to meet the FAA spec. The existing 1.5mm hole will give you good results, though🙂

As I keep saying EPOXY - just use some HD epoxy, to plug the existing hole and then carefully drill with a 1mm bit - there is no need to drill out/enlarge what you have and then fit a plug with a 1mm hole. This aperture is for relativly low pressure air, without abrasive characteristics and as an amature, infrequent use, tool does not warrant the effort of redoing it in metal.  If achieving the same result in metal makes you happy - go for it!

 

FAA - Australian???

Inches - Australian???

 

I agree with leaving the tester as is - as mentioned earlier - the leak down test is primarily a comparative one ie record an initial reading, then compare all future reading with this, noting changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you pressurise a cylinder on TDC make sure it doesn't move from TDC or the prop will whack someone.. ???? Another delayed post

  Skip, flow rate is what you are trying to get and diameter length of the hole and it's finish all play a part in that . Nev

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, facthunter said:

If you pressurise a cylinder on TDC make sure it doesn't move from TDC or the prop will whack someone.. ???? Another delayed post

  Skip, flow rate is what you are trying to get and diameter length of the hole and it's finish all play a part in that . Nev

Agree, must be right on TDC otherwise will drive piston down and direction will be relative to before or after TDC.  I have passed on info to Bill.

Edited by Blueadventures
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, skippydiesel said:

As I keep saying EPOXY - just use some HD epoxy, to plug the existing hole and then carefully drill with a 1mm bit - there is no need to drill out/enlarge what you have and then fit a plug with a 1mm hole. This aperture is for relativly low pressure air, without abrasive characteristics and as an amature, infrequent use, tool does not warrant the effort of redoing it in metal.  If achieving the same result in metal makes you happy - go for it!

 

FAA - Australian???

Inches - Australian???

 

I agree with leaving the tester as is - as mentioned earlier - the leak down test is primarily a comparative one ie record an initial reading, then compare all future reading with this, noting changes.

IF you want to make one that meets the FAA spec (AC43.13 1B), then you need to make the orifice to spec and insert it. Filling the hole with epoxy and drilling 1mm will give you something close, but not as per spec (the OP requested 1mm orifice, so I take that as "FAA spec"). Because the FAA did give that spec, it is the standard in the aviation engine industry. The 2 major engine manufacturers (and Rotax) refer to that:

image.png.58ae516ea90701d4c14c715f2592561b.png

image.png.baa2c529d9dd3c62ef66a7f6fb3701da.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pluessy - Its a compartaive test.

 

If you have precision/certified testing equipment, you may get the same/similar results from diffrent certified testers.

 

If you use the same tester (povo pack or most expensive) the results should be consistent ie you don't actually need to go the the trouble of modifying a povo tester to (near) certified standards - the same tester will deliver consistent results or at least close enough  for the average home mechanic.

 

If you want to convert by drilling out & inserting a purpose made plug that's fine however the cheapest quickest way, is to use high quality epoxy to achieve the near regulation( ID 1 mm  x 3mm long) aperture.

 

The next best would be to form or join a club that will purchase & share expensive infrequently used equipment.

 

I would compare the use of this type of tester  (Cylinder Leak Down & Compression) to getting a crankcase oil analysis/test. The first one you do, is just to establish the base data , almost useless in its own right. Subsequent testing (if you consistently test at the same number of service hours and same/very similar oil, similar/same fuel, can then be compared with the base data. The comparison will tell you (trained operator) if the engine is performing/wearing as expected - the more tests the better the quality of information, from which to make your deductions.

 

FYI: I know the LDT can also be used as a diagnostic tool for damaged valves & rings, etc, however its main benefit is tracking, over time, the changes in cylinder integrity.

Edited by skippydiesel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you make your own tester eg the cheapy or a modifed version, then the OEM specs are meaningless!

 

As already pointed out, the leak-down test is overrated. Do a dynamic compression test and track that. Quicker, simpler and more accurate representation of the internal condition.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you know what you are looking for, you can do a pretty good check pulling it through by hand and you can do that easily before the first flight of the day. How much the engine Breathes out the breather is important also and you can hear the valves leaking if you listen in the exhaust or intake with the throttle fixed wide open. If your engine shakes or has a different beat. Investigate that. IF it "fixes itself" it's still suspect because they usually don't.  Nev.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, pluessy said:

If you make your own tester eg the cheapy or a modifed version, then the OEM specs are meaningless!

 

As already pointed out, the leak-down test is overrated. Do a dynamic compression test and track that. Quicker, simpler and more accurate representation of the internal condition.

Why not do both, while you have plugs out and keep a record for later comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/1/2024 at 12:42 PM, BillLipson said:

Looking for recommendations for for where I can obtain a reasonably priced leak down tester in Australia. Must have the recommended 1mm orifice.

Sorry Bill, I sold mine on here just recently.

Regards Kev

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...