kgwilson Posted Monday at 12:52 AM Posted Monday at 12:52 AM (edited) 10 out of 15 Boeing Engineers said in an interview they wouldn't fly on a Dreamliner. There are plenty of youtube videos citing Boeings problems and especially the problems with the 787. https://en.as.com/videos/video-of-boeing-engineers-goes-viral-i-wouldnt-fly-on-one-of-these-planes-v/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxV0CqGlgwQ&t=12s Edited Monday at 12:54 AM by kgwilson 1
facthunter Posted Monday at 01:15 AM Posted Monday at 01:15 AM The "Culture" Of Boeing is skewed to Profit above all else. Probably Accountant driven Union Hating and establishing and sub contracting NEW companies where work conditions are a bit wild and primitive. I've never been Keen on the Dreamliner but it does have colossal range. There was never any secret among those watching what was going on about Boeings workplace Culture and cost cutting. The short Undercarriage limited the type of engines that could be fitted to the older 737's which already had rudder actuation Problems. causing fatalities . I chose to NEVER be endorsed on them. 1
onetrack Posted Tuesday at 03:15 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:15 PM The AAIB has released a statement saying they expect to produce a preliminary report by about July 11th. But the preliminary report will only be around 4 to 5 pages and just confirm basic details of the crash. However, it may also indicate the lines of investigation, and therefore the pointers to the cause of the crash. The investigation is ruling out nothing at this point, and is including possible sabotage as one of the lines of investigation. This is not to say sabotage is suspected, only that they have to investigate the potential of sabotage, and examine any information (witnesses or black box evidence) that could increase the likelihood of any sabotage. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/air-india-crash-probe-report-next-week-will-outline-damage-and-possible-causes-8807615
Underwood Posted Tuesday at 04:09 PM Posted Tuesday at 04:09 PM That there has been not even a hint of grounding airframes for any checks is at this point telling. Certainly if no such recommendation comes in the next few days then Boeing will be relieved 2 1
red750 Posted Wednesday at 06:18 AM Posted Wednesday at 06:18 AM An Air India plane plunged 900ft during its flight just two days after the disaster crash that killed 241 people onboard and dozens more on the ground, the airline has revealed. The plane, flying from Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport for Vienna, dropped 900ft in midair during a flight on June 14. It landed safely in Vienna following a nine-hour flight, but both pilots onboard have since been grounded pending an investigation by India's air watchdog, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), into the incident, Air India said. 2
facthunter Posted Wednesday at 06:29 AM Posted Wednesday at 06:29 AM Probably COMPLETELY Unrelated Causally. Just sensation. Nev 1
onetrack Posted Wednesday at 08:10 AM Posted Wednesday at 08:10 AM (edited) The trash media are using the altitude loss event of an Air India B777 to continue to smear Air India, and make it look like every AI aircraft is a crash waiting to happen. Re Red750's report - The AI B777, Flight AI-187, took off from Delhi during a violent thunderstorm. On climbout, the aircraft obviously flew into a severe bout of turbulence and a heavy downdraught. From official sources - “The (B777) aircraft was involved in an inflight occurrence of stick shaker and GPWS caution. Soon after takeoff, stick shaker warning and GPWS 'don’t sink' caution appeared. Stall warning occurred once, and GPWS caution occurred twice. There was an altitude loss of around 900 feet during climb. Subsequently, the crew recovered the aircraft, and continued the flight to Vienna." However, officials pointed out that the post-flight report for the Delhi-Vienna leg only cited, “stick shaker due to turbulence after takeoff,” without detailing other significant alerts. A deeper review of the flight data recorder (DFDR) - most likely as part of increased surveillance after the AI 171 crash - had revealed additional warnings, including a “don’t sink” GPWS alert and a stall warning, that had not been documented earlier. As a result, the flight crew have been temporarily suspended from further duties until the B777 altitude loss investigation is complete. Possibly the major concern around this incident is the GPWS warning sounding, which indicates terrain was far too close to the flight path. Edited Wednesday at 08:12 AM by onetrack
Underwood Posted Wednesday at 10:15 AM Posted Wednesday at 10:15 AM Long before all this I decided I would not fly on an indian crewed aircraft, not saying it was crew mistakes in this case, but there are just too many instances of poor behaviour and crap CRM in Indian flight crews Maybe my perception is not valid but its my persona position 1 1
Litespeed Posted Wednesday at 11:20 AM Posted Wednesday at 11:20 AM I would think the lesson was don't go Boeing 787 until we know the cause of the crash. If the people who build them won't fly then why should we. 3 1 1
danny_galaga Posted Thursday at 12:35 AM Posted Thursday at 12:35 AM Interesting news concerning the airline and possible culture/lack of training issues https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/air-india-pilots-suspension-boeing-777-stall-warning-b2780259.html 1
facthunter Posted Thursday at 01:08 AM Posted Thursday at 01:08 AM Likely due to the Storms around. Normal procedure is to investigate and possibly recommend retraining or avoidance RADAR or use a higher climb speed. Some planes have a thing like Alpha floor where the engines automatically go to a full power setting in such circumstances. At lower altitudes there is a LOT of Reserve Power available on modern twin jet engined planes 1 1
onetrack Posted Thursday at 01:14 AM Posted Thursday at 01:14 AM The GEnX engines in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner have increased thrust over previous models such as the CF6. The GEnX can generate up to 78,000 lbs of thrust at sea level, thus enabling the Dreamliner to take off with adequate power to spare, even at MTOW in high temperatures and high elevations. 1
facthunter Posted Thursday at 01:35 AM Posted Thursday at 01:35 AM Nearly all take-offs are done with reduced thrust to improve engine life. Nev 2
Blueadventures Posted Thursday at 02:28 AM Posted Thursday at 02:28 AM 51 minutes ago, facthunter said: Nearly all take-offs are done with reduced thrust to improve engine life. Nev Also prevents throwing a con rod. (Yep, know we’re talking jet engines, just and old saying) 2 1
facthunter Posted Thursday at 07:10 AM Posted Thursday at 07:10 AM It's about temps Cycles accumulating. You usually chuck a Rod when changing gear at high revs. It's a "specific" overstress. Nev 1 1
facthunter Posted Thursday at 07:50 AM Posted Thursday at 07:50 AM Conrods generally fail in tension. Changing direction near the top of the stroke. They want to keep going. Nev 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now