Jump to content

BrendAn

First Class Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,400

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40

 Content Type 

Everything posted by BrendAn

  1. BrendAn
    Sending DM now. Darren is his name. Great bloke. Does parachutes,hot air balloons and aerochutes.
  2. BrendAn
    i know someone who can check your chute but he doesn't do the rocket .
  3. BrendAn
    It's only plugging off a cabin heat ducting .
  4. BrendAn
    part 103 gives access to aircraft like this.
  5. BrendAn
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8dfe4ad8c3f0b7c59487e5045f636ae84e745a11bb261dcf336318c78e0ba412JmltdHM9MTczNjEyMTYwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=3fb660a2-cc63-62fe-19da-75a5cdb663f5&psq=merlin+lite+part+103&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9ieWRhbmpvaG5zb24uY29tL21lcmxpbi1saXRlLW5ldy1hbGwtbWV0YWwtZnVsbHktZW5jbG9zZWQtZGVsdXhlLXBhcnQtMTAzLXVsdHJhbGlnaHQv&ntb=1
  6. BrendAn
    A couple of days ago you put up a brilliant post. Now you have gone back to being deflection turbo. Tell everyone they are wrong but never explain yourself.
  7. BrendAn
    The people in raaus that were pushing for it have all been let go over the years. That's what I have heard anyway.
  8. BrendAn
    From what I have been told, casa want the faa part 103 rule here. It completely takes away any responsibility from them . Michael monk jumping up and down on the tv demanding investigations may help 103 come to fruition here.
  9. BrendAn
    Casa part 103 is a different thing altogether. Just uses the same number .
  10. BrendAn
    You can fly a hummelbird anywhere but here. Is our sky different.
  11. BrendAn
    The uk now have the ssdr category. Single seat deregulated. I assume that might be there version of p103.
  12. BrendAn
    This subject has been getting kicked about the group for a long time. There are some of us who would like to fly under the faa part 103 rules in Australia. Turbo keeps saying we already have it . I would like turbo or someone to explain this. I really hope it's true because it would open the door to affordable flying like in the auf days.
  13. BrendAn
    Ok. I agree this thread should get back on topic. How about we start another thread and you tell us about this part 103 equivalent you keep talking about.
  14. BrendAn
    Turbo gave the membership cost for the sporting shooters association.😁. Handy to know I suppose
  15. BrendAn
    Turbo is convinced we have it but won't elaborate
  16. BrendAn
    Why can't you just answer a question.
  17. BrendAn
    More rubbish. These posts seem to be more about your ego and trying to show your intellectual superiority to us lowly commoners. Wtf has the sporting shooters association got to do with flying. Show me the equivalent of part 103. Are you an raaus member. I doubt it.
  18. BrendAn
    Well that tells me nothing . There is no equivalent except in your mind.
  19. BrendAn
    Raaus are dead against bringing it in because they are afraid of losing members and their money. But it would only be a small group that would switch anyway.
  20. BrendAn
    Show us the equivalent of part 103. I don't understand what you're talking about.
  21. BrendAn
    We don't have the equivalent to 103. Are you talking about the early category. 300ft ceiling . No flight over bitumen rds.
  22. BrendAn
    I watched a YouTube yesterday. a flight in a Cirrus sr22. The owner said Cirrus advise 600ft minimum to deploy chute but the manufacturer of the chutes says deploy at any height. I have read of a chute deployment at 100 ft that saved the pilots life.
  23. BrendAn
    Witnesses observed it flying very low struggling to gain altitude.
  24. BrendAn
    I realise it won't be compulsory. The point I was making is raa is moving into the GA world .
  25. BrendAn
    The woman in the video used to be one of our councillors. Wellington shire.
×
×
  • Create New...