From what I read the requirement will be extra training for the CT endorsement.. which is 'essentially' similar to training requirements for an RPL and the same medical and aircraft requirements... so....
What am I missing here .. and why is there discussion on this failed proposal.
IF You have want or need CT .. do RPL...
What I would prefer is a "realistic" 700+Kg not the present GA spec requirement (LAME etc)
If I am required to fly essentially a GA plane I would not be in RAA would I...
until