accountability as far as I can see when it was okay for raa to pay for another air craft that got repaired through a mishap but the so called experts could not and would not look into the repair that was done and was completely against the repair manual the repairer did not have said manual for aircraft when it was available to him
his claim that I as owner of said aircraft did not supply it to him he was at that time an l4 and a cassa lame
no a well known l2 did fly to were the aircraft was and did an inspection off said aircraft and was appalled at what he witnessed yet raa tec did not even bother to inspect parts remove from repaired at a fly in
don I have a feeling that you are being fed a heap of bull
specific question don take a look into storch s 24 4524 that was owned by neil t Bradley and the blatant disregard for rules and regulation by raa and you tell me its okay
when I informed raa about the rotax return line to the tank nothing has been done about it I have this gut feeling that this may have contributed to 3 accidents if not more why has this not been addressed as it has been in the rotax since 1997 on all 912 motors and 912 s motors
can you produce a document from rotax saying that a return line is not required on all 912 rotax motors as the tec has refused to supply me with it
don so an aircraft that requires a new engine frame, new windscreen, new legs, new under carriage, new legs,new firwall , new rudder peddles ,new gasculator ,repair to wing tip cracked leading edge ,re rigged as the rigging was 20 degrees out 2 l2 would not pass this aircraft as airworthy
trust raa to be transparent bull
I would hate to go flying with some take off and he hands me a shifter and says tighten the wheel nut will yah repairs on the run sound familure neil