storchy neil

no I have not been hit with any charges with any violation of aviation law now no body else has crashed my plane to my knowledge making insinuation that these things have happened goes to show what I am saying is fact some here are so ignorant both casa and raa are not abiding by our rules at no time have I Infered that the contact with the wires was not my fault as duty of care is with the pilot what I have written in a previous post still stands it must hurting you fact one casa have written to my solicitor not our problem raa problem letter from raa to my solicitor not our problem when we have lame l2 l3 walking away because of head office not doing their duty of care neil and the answer is

the reason that i will not answer kaz is that it is totally off course off what this discussion is about neil

insinuations by you kaz will not do any good i there for will treat your remarks in contempt neil

yes dafydd two off em :crazy:neil

yes deastick there are a lot of bloody good lame"s l2 l3 l4 who are being brought down by some dipsticks that were not brought to account by past regulators off our office you are not the only one thinking is it worth it being an l2 deastick said such a shame that we are not allowed to contribute to the direction of our group i totally agree with you but some off what daren is doing is already in our rules not all but some I have been in personal contact with quite a few and like you they are astounded at what and how the repairs to my aircraft were carried out what has got to me is the fact that I have all the evidence off none compliance off the lame l2 l3 that did the work and nobody from casa raa will look at it if it is to big for RAA why have they not put it to casa I did send a lot of paper work to raa photos included why have they not passed this on to casa neil

I must be in stupids corner as when I owned the rotex I always started on one and shut down on one neil

fact to hard for me let some one else do it and I will live off their hard work as it does not affect me at the moment but when it does affect me I will scream blue bloody murder as some one else should have done it neil

. Also how many LAME maintained brand XXX have failed, and why? answer in short if I report a defect in any aircraft that is going to cost owner I wont get any work duty off care sucks it is not there how about lame l2 sighned out aircraft for four years with leaking fuel tank neil

this could end very badly if it In the past Courts of Law have also questioned the maintenance practices of RAAus. I anticipate we will have between 4-6 Coronial enquiries in the next 2 years looking at all aspects of RAAus, including maintenance. If any of those enquiries lay blame on RAAus then a civil matter seeking compensation is likely to follow. If hypothetically that civil matter is successful and there was a finding in relation to L2 maintenance failure, then upon further discovery it is shown that RAAus does not even follow its own rules ie tech manual then that could very well be the end of our great organisation. We have improved dramatically in the last 12 months, we need to continue down that road. Sometimes a little pain now is better than a lot forced on you later on. one would have jumped on me for what I have written about work done by lame l2 l3 so why have you not bounced me out off raa This whole process is not new. It has been in the tech manual for ages. It just has never had a Tech Manager ensuring the Tech Manual is followed as per their employment requirement. As an active restricted L2 I can personally say I have seen work performed by other L2's that has far from impressed me. I have been involved in several repairs as the second person and there is nothing worse! I have met some members with a 'I'll give it a go" attitude. Thats ok for working on a go-kart but a plane! yes spriteah that is the reason failure to abide by our rules is going to bite us at some point opps it already has had I been tec manager for raa when i first got wind of a situation like mine where bad publicity was not doing my organization any good at all I would got it out off the publics eyes very quickly I am not blaming anybody as the problem was systemic years ago when raa started handing out l2 licences to people that could not read our rules neil

hold the bloody boat spriteah you cant be cant be right:roflmao:spot on saying that neil

bloody crap and corruption when I wanted a lame aero nautical engineer to examine my plane "quote to hard I wont get any work or that means casa will have to be involved cant go against others unquote know saying that my case is very rare is may be right but you wont hear about others as some people don't have the balls to do any thing and that is a fact both casa and raa failed in duty of care one big time lame quote "just forget it fix the plane and fly away "unquote now for some it may be no problem for him but for me it is as should the person kill some one personally known to me or some other pilot from woop woop this affects me the lack off reporting and the don't tell anyone i want to sell my plane if no one knows the spar is broken if know one knows the tank leeks if no one knows that lame l2 l3 fixed it on the quite now the not investigating complaints about work carried out not to the satisfaction of P I C just plane sucks to me apparently duty of care does not apply to aviation now I have looked both persons in the eye that have a near imposible job of steering us as in you and I to a path of peace a quite from casa by abiding by our rules and regs and said quote "I don't want your job that has been forced upon you by educated imbersiles before you " unquote so what if we that is you and I have to pay more for a leader that is accountable and can get us on a path of stability where we don't have the shxx hitting those that do not deserve it as is the case with some of our lame l2 l3 l4 now with out good l2 l3 l4 we don't fly neil

hey maj have a lock at Cootamundra nsw and check it out nice strip just my 2 bobs worth neil

wording from insurance company email to me after repairs quote" you picked him as your repairer "unquote does the insure now of other botched jobs he has done like a sting repair neil

yes stearman their is statistical proof how many accidents in the last year never mind the rego crap we as an organization haft to start telling it as it is there is to many planes that do not comply with our regs notice I said our regs yes our regs what you are saying is pure guess work were are your stats to prove that lack off maintenance is not the problem I am lucky that I am not in a box 6 feet under ground through maintenance as one instructor said you either stupid or a good pilot rego delays also include maintenance that was in a lot cases involved weight and balance not done props not suited to plane neil

sorry deadstick that don't work what raa and casa are saying is that the lame l2 l3 that found this are lying neil

how about lame that sighned out ga plane with prop 6 months out of time or the bloke with that bought the drifter with mended spar or the l2 l3 that replaced steering rods in a 24 reg aircraft from bearing services how many more do you want how about the lame l2 l3 telling me that 912 motors don't have return line to tank when shown in rotax installation manual said that's bullxxxx they don't have to have that neil

how about the school that has a training air craft that has a fuel tank that has had a leak in it for over 4 years sighned out by lame l2 neil

flysynthesis storch s 912 s 80 hp I was landing into a paddock and failed to see power wires power wires tore off nose wheel I then flew 5 nm and landed on a strip with no nose wheel I landed use power as I no that I could land at 40 knts very safely by leaning back in the seat I kept the nose up in the air when I reached for magy switch it went on to the nose tail was near vertical right hand wing slammed in to the ground broke the prop broke the windscreen broke off fin under tail through keeping nose so high parts ordered were new prop new right hand wing tip new wind screen new fuel gasculator new nose wheel and olio new fin on tail new door now the l2 l3 could not get the eltric flaps indercator to work nor could he get the egt to work and told me to fly the plane to melb [removed] sighned out aircraft found by another l2 l3 after repaires done rigging out 20 25 degrees leading edge off right hand wing cracked windscreen not installed properly mod to gasculator not legal bent undercarriage bent legs loose engine bolts not torqued to engine frame bent engine frame from prop strike no weight and balance done bent rudder peddles return fuel line not on air craft as should be on all 912 engines new right hand wing tip was not put on plane as l2 l3 could make it fit neil

the written contract for the repaires was with ME and [removed] the repairer LAME plus l2 l3 vero insurance was the insurer I refused to sighn the release form so as they VERO could pay [removed] that was feb 2008 I HAVE NEVER SIGHNED THE RELEASE FORM I was abused by [removed] about not sighning release form but vero paid [removed] without my knowledge casa wrote back to my solicitor and said civil mater take it to raa donkin wrote back to my solicitor civil mater in court it was stated that the repairer did not have any repair manuals at all neil ps their is only one tec bloke that was looking at our problem I was willing to pay for his in put to assessing the problem with my plane and he was sacked how would you explain my plane that I did own as a garden ornament bit embarasing for aviation I would say neil Neil, On advice from a qualified legal professional, names have been removed and will continue to be so. - Mod

ha ha ha I am laughing told you so you recond that is the end no way you blokes can cop it now so suck it up darlings you blind persons read your own rules and regs the court case that I lost trough your tec manager not getting involved in the repair of the aircraft that I did own the handing out of the l2 l3 was a farce now in your defence read what a magestraite said in my case you don't have to repair a plane to airworthy just repair it neil

In your case, if you fly into a wire and talk about it enough, someone from CASA is likely to notice and charge you with flying below 500 feet, me bloody ladder aint that tall so how do I get out off plane sold me shute 40 year ago read my report buddy You had your day in Court before a Magistrate who ruled on your allegations, so you take a risk continuing to rubbish them, and question the Magistrate's decision had raa tec manager done an inspection of the work carried by a l2 l3 appointed by raa to repair said plane as I see this is a failure by duty of care accreaditation by raa there for makes them raa bound by law to be responsible to ensure that planes fixed or repaired by their agent to meet the airworthy requirements neil

what turbs your saying is a load of buxx dust how in the hell is casa going to find you so my reporting of my incident is differant to you flying in to cloud had I not reported I would just shut up one rule for you both cases are duty bound by P I C the person to report it in both cases some can die what would you say had I just put my plane at Bendigo on cross hire and the plane crashed and killed some one as it was legal for me to do all I had to do was fly to Bendigo contract was ready to go as mortz says Some bordering on downright stupidity and I fit that bill law to report all incidents and accidents but it apparently is not law to report a bad lame l2 l3 is what you are saying turbs human factors but my experience has been that the ones that poo pooed it the most were the ones who actually NEEDED it the most. yes facthunter totally agree I just wonder how many have flown melb to Darwin in their little plane that is when human factors comes into play my book shows 220 hrs P I C also shows 96 hrs duel some of duel was in different air craft so as I was comfortable flying any sort of aircraft neil

turbs it does not work reported lame l2 l3 to casa I might as well pisxxxxed on the moon a lame reported to casa you are leading blokes astray don't start me on reporting to casa it is a crock off sxxx this lame could have killed me neil

That is not necessarily correct and I can remember in the days of the Department of Transport and Regional Services, or maybe just Transport, when the truck industry was given the ultimatum of building trucks with a braking system beyond known engineering technology - an academic's thought buckle on how good it would be if trucks could stop in the same distance as cars. yes what a load xxxx that was I feel that caused a lot of accidents but who am I me was just a dumb truck driver neil

The aircraft is still flyable but the crack is unsightly not legal in raaus to fly neil