storchy neil

bloody bull crap and corruption you don't have to follow manafactors manual the majasstrait said he is wrte you know cause some one with now knoled said so I have it in writing neil

yes went well good news is that it has been confirmed in writing and verbely that lame l2 l3 can make an aeroplane air worthy with these defects bent undercarriage cracked windscreen egt not working flap indercator not working replace motor not to rotax installation manual does not have to have repair manual for said plane or tec data bent engine frame bent rudder peddles no weight and balance done so all off you that that have bent over and been scewed because no weight and balance the court says you don't have to abide by rules so just chuck it to gether its air worthy ra aus cant have it they have broken our rules and reg as well as air law by condoning the findings now at the meeting it was stated that we need to get more members we as body need to sell recflying more as a safe sport no bloody way as to what has been done to me neil

If your rigging is true you can take off and land using rudder and trim only Neil.

about time some l2 l3 got it in the neck what have I been saying for the last 5 years expect more of off this keep it up daran but I feel that there has to be penalties for down right abuse off our rules example what about training air craft with leeking fuel tank neil

looks like hard work oh shxx hand me the vigra neil

I can send a fully grammar'ed message via my mobile phone, it's just laziness on the part of people who don't sowhocaresifyoudothatmustbesomewitheyebraindefectsneil

reporting to raa waste off time get your bloody facts right reporting to casa ditto you blokes think I am joking be at the next agm I will produce facts in writing neil

justgoestoshowthatsomepeoplesbrainsonlypickupmymistakesneiltheirbrainisonlytheirtokeepearsapart

don some think it was easy for you to leave the board getting out saved your house and your sanity as far as I am concerned you have voiced you opinion in a very constructive manner for some to criticise and not look at the big pitcher when you have brought to their attension thing that are wrong and should be addressed now not latter after talking to you at Temora I feel that if you just walked away and not give a shit about anyone your passion for raa to succeed not just bumble its way along would still be there after all is this site for discussion off flying and related incidents including our board that was once just there for glory put there by puppets and manipulation but when a person comes along and has the balls to not be gerked around by idiots that ran an organization witch was in my words corrupt example 14000 members plus insurance planes that did not comply lack off communication no accountability to some that criticise with out knowing facts are in my oppion puppets neil l

be aware any fixture to aircraft a new weight and balance must be done neil

yeh deadstick get them to put it in writing neil

must be judge legal said it was neil \

first hand knowledge you can source parts from any where for 24 reg aircraft neil

The vehicle’s headlights were intended to illuminate the upwind end of the strip, facing the oncoming aircraft. please show me where it says gps waypoint was mentioned What happened On 27 June 2013, a Cirrus SR22 aircraft, registered VH-CKS, collided with a tree that was adjacent to the private airstrip at Boxwood, Victoria. The pilot of the aircraft was attempting to land on the unlit airstrip after last light. As a result of the collision, the pilot lost control and the aircraft continued for a short distance before impacting terrain inverted. The pilot was fatally injured and the aircraft destroyed What the ATSB found The pilot was appropriately licensed to operate the visual flight rules category aircraft at night and had passed a number of airports in the vicinity, all of which were appropriate for a night landing. However, consistent with a degree of self-imposed pressure to get home after a series of business commitments and prior to a1-month period away from home, the pilot bypassed these airports and continued to their property airstrip. This airstrip did not meet the physical, lighting and obstacle clearance requirements for night operations. The final approach to land was made after last light, with a family member positioned in a motor vehicle ‘at the end of the strip’. The vehicle’s headlights were intended to illuminate the upwind end of the strip, facing the oncoming aircraft. However, this lighting was inadequate and provided insufficient guidance for the approach and landing. This increased the risk of a collision with terrain. Safety message Night landings at inadequately lit airstrips are inherently dangerous and increase the risk of a collision with terrain. The requirements for the conduct of operations at night, including lighting, pilot qualifications, aircraft equipment and systems and aerodrome equipment are intended to reduce this risk. It is likely that, had these risk controls been given effect, this accident would not have happened. you cannot land straight at head lights off a single car without a reference point as to the end off strip for touch down that is why in my case up north five cars were used the end was marked with a cars hazard light all cars at touch down were using hazard lights and head lights nullarbore was the same but using truck lights now that is a lot off day light

so turbs his hrs and qualification excuse him from being totally to blame for stupid behaviour so landing into head lights of a car I how cool you are totally wrong having been at a night landing of a flying doc plane up north at an unlit strip no lights were in the direction of the plane all lights were shone in direction of travel of plane also on the nullabore as I said in a previous thread this pilot needed an inoculation for get home ites but its to late now the people he leaves behind are paying for his stupidity the linking together off planes that are off different flight envelopes is ridiculous neil

in case you think I was being stupid GHI stands for the get home itess as what has been found as to the boxwood crash witch killed the pilot passing suitable landing sites why neil

so another pilot suffers from G H I why in hell cant a cure be found for it ? neil

that's why I don't use spll check wife would not under stand neil

maj write a book oh hell:scratching head: take to long to read the condensed version:roflmao: no flying as laughter would distract you neil

twice now I have had my motor shut down on late final once at shep and once at loocksley cant say why here might up set some one now it is totally different with a dead motor so why cant it be taught I feel that it should be up around toc I have encountered thermals many times and pulled the power off and sailed like an bird neil

condolences to the family off those involved assumptions by some as to what might have happened bloody well shut up unless you have facts neil

don't put up facts cause :cheezy grin:some one will not under stand make a pridiction ok neil:tongue in cheek:

I personally recommend after a person has done about 8 to 10 hrs get a second instructor to show them how he would handle the situation as I have had three top instructors that drilled in to me the value of fly the bloody plane practice all you can but if your instructor has taught you wrong in the first place it will not change like one aspiring pilot I went for a flight with no pre landing checks what so ever flew on final 30 to 45 degrees had to turn at under 100 feet to line up strip when question on why he did it that way replied no one is here to see it i aint been back or this one pilot learning could not get flare right took him for a flight in right hand seat and told him just shut up and watch his instructor latter on asked what I had taught him quote "not allowed to teach him but there is no rule to say I cant show him" unquote there is an old saying monkey do as monkey see neil

:tongue in cheek:peter 008 good one as a joke installer :thumb up:got any more it shore started a war of words and assumptions polictul readings