I believe that the media needs educating about the difference between reporting and doing an opinion piece.
Having mentioned this in another thread, I'll not reiterate it in full, but if there was less effort put into sensationalizing, and more into getting the facts, less controversy would occur. The use of emotive words, instead of descriptive words plays a key part.
High powered.. Narrowly missing.. Disintegrated.. Dangerously low..
Instead of
200hp.. missed by 10 meters.. Broke into 3 pieces.. 500ft above the ground..
If the facts are not available, simply say so. In my eyes, using all this emotive language simply shows the reporters views towards something, not what the actual news is. 200hp, my be, in fact, a low powered machine, depending on what it is.
And again, this is not limited to aircraft accidents/incidents. Pick any subject, and op-Ed pieces are passed off as news.
My 2c