In my long experience (60 years) of owning, repairing and dealing with many warranty claims on a very wide range of engines - many from reputable manufacturers (including large American ones), the standard across-the-board warranty policy is - the manufacturer identifies the reason for the problem, and if they find and admit to faulty parts or components, the replacement is limited to the supply and installation of the faulty parts/components, and repairs are done at the manufacturers expense, limited to replacement of the faulty parts/components - and no other claims for costs or inconvenience, or other incidental losses, or replacement of associated parts/components, will be entertained.
One of the biggest problems I have found is actually trying to get manufacturers to admit to manufacturing faults. In some cases, I had to get an independent report that produced evidence of faulty parts/components. In this case, Jabiru have "manned up" and admitted they've produced a faulty component, and are willing to replace it at their cost.
I think this is very reasonable, and I don't think it's reasonable, or fair, or even legally enforceable, for Jabiru engine owners to try and get Jabiru to pay for transportation/relocation of the owners aircraft, or supply a brand new complete engine, or to try and claim other incidental costs related to the repair or downtime.