Kyle Communications

Rotax 912 Parts Trader ,Swap ,sell & After Market Bits | Facebook WWW.FACEBOOK.COM

Here are some pictures that Peter sent of the seats covered and how they fit and the way the seat base is built

The savannah does have parachute fitment instructions and of course is a std fit in most of Europe. RANS has been working on one I believe but it wont matter as mine is a amateur build so can literally install what you like. Factory builts etc especially older ones are a different matter....according to our antiquated and stifled rule system for aircraft

I have a Galaxy chute for Mabel. A chute for a 600kg aircraft weighs around 13kg all up. I imported mine directly from the factory but that was a bit of a mission. I now know a lot more than I did then and would go a slightly different route but still direct import. The boss wants one in the RANS S-21 as well. Specs from memory is the min deployment for the chute is 150ft and the decent rate was 6.5mtrs per sec at 600kg The one for the RANS though needs to be 760kg and is substantially more expensive...twice as expensive as the 600kg one

I will get Peter to send me a couple of pictures of his finished seats

I wish I took a picture of Peter's seats when he was here at xmas time. They look fantastic. Yes the different colours are different densities of foam

This is the way Peter did his seats

Hi Marty I am going to build them up from varying grades of foam then get them upholstered. Peter Bleys made his a similar way...I have some pics somewhere and will post them. This way you can make the seats comfortable..the std sav thin seats are crappy. The way I have done my seat bases I always was going to build my own seats like peters. Peter flew into the farm around xmas time and I was looking at his finished seats and they are really nice. Would be really comfy in bumpy conditions

I have made a few batches now. They go as fast as I make them. need more hours in a day between working and CDI modules and Throttle systems and rebuilding Mabel and building a house at the farm.....I need 60 plus hrs a day

parts are not exempt complete engines are...I have the empty wallet to prove it Its under a different customs code..they knobled me for a big bore kit..and they quoted the paragraph

I am about to make a new stick for my twin stick setup..it will have the Ray Allen grip on it

I love the whole wing/spar design on this aircraft. Apparently its from a old Luscombe design. The centre truss arrangement and front and rear spar just makes sense for ease of build and strength

Great video and so much automation in the processes.....but isnt automation supposed to make things cheaper? 🙂 I would hate to think how much all those robots and CNC machines would be worth. Very impressive. Certainly much more info than that old video of aircraft engine assembly thats been on youtube for a lot of years..would like to have seen more but they also may not have been able to film those tasks or operations

Well its a big week this week. Work has finally started on my S-21 build. RodgerC who had a S-20 with the 141 wing and the round tail ( christened a RANS S-20.5) that came in the container I organised with mine and Greg's S-21 has finished his beautifully built aircraft and it has some 50 odd hours on it now. Rodger asked me if he could help me building my S-21 as I am still finally getting the the finish line with Mabel but still a bit away until I can clear my workshop out by getting Mable to the hangar for assembly. Of course I jumped at the chance to have such a craftsman help me put it together and of course he has already put together a set of 141 wings and they are the same series of itteration of back in 2019 so he knows all the traps in putting them together. This will help shorten my build time a lot seeing its been so long since the kit got here in Oct 2019 I got all the parts for the wings over to his place earlier this week and he has started prep already. I will be heading over there helping him when he needs it or I can get a chance to get over there and annoy him. As soon as Mabel vacates the workshop I will start on either the tailfeathers or fuselage..probably the fuselage I think. I will be away overseas for almost 2 weeks with my very understanding wife from Tuesday for some R&R to a mates wedding. We both need a break I should have Mabel down to the hangar a few weeks after that so can start the S-21 fuselage here. I am excited 🙂 A picture of Rodgers S-20.5 is here as well It is such a lovely built aircraft

I have moved this thread from Other Aircraft into the now available RANS location in the forum

Hot off the press from Eprop This is a great video for how to set it up for any aircraft

Making some headway now. The cowl I did all actually fits :)...avionics wiring all finished except for radio ptt in the sticks. twin sticks all fitted, pedals back in and new brake lines. When I get back from Thailand I will start cutting the windscreen and cabin top...then its almost off to the hangar for Mabel 🙂

Durandal is a tractor prop Excalibur is a pusher prop and the Glorious is the new IFA constant speed one

Feedback on FK9. https://aircraft.e-props.fr/index.php?cPath=1_33_192

Carbon Canary..what is the aircraft ?..you may find it on the feedback

All I can tell you is that there have been a few DUC props replaced by the Eprop here and everyone of the guys says the eprop is much better..quieter, more performance, super smooth also the engine starts and stops easier because the prop is so light. I have not had one person return a prop. Eprop give a 6 month return on the prop..If you use it and you dont find its a improvement and a better prop than what you like they will give you your money back....someone who stands behind their product https://aircraft.e-props.fr/satisfied.php Just some small feedback...977 of them https://aircraft.e-props.fr/feedback.php

I just had a answer back from Eprop on the time for their props..there is no time constraint only the 4000 hours due to the way they are made and the special material they use

Yes I service Australia and NZ

Got no idea..but some of the aircraft get a lot of use

No its not...he tested it to how he wanted to...NOT to how the props are designed to be run His testing was done as if you have a IFA or constant speed. These props are ground ajustable and designed to run a max rpm on a gearbox driven engine If you set them up as per factory instructions you will get a substantial improvement in performance...more than 50 customers I have sent props to with maybe 15 or more different style of aircraft cant all be idiots..they know what performs better than what they had. I have not had one customer that did not get substantial performance increase