Jump to content

djpacro

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,948

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Everything posted by djpacro

  1. djpacro
    I like a Raven (or the original Haigh) on a Pitts S-1 - it can be locked straight so tames the aeroplane (at least once the wheels are on the ground).
  2. djpacro
    Seen the new advanced stalling and incipient spin elements in Part 61 MOS? Yes indeed, even more so with the new Part 61. My opinion is that the advanced stalling/incipient spin exercises require an instructor with a spin training endorsement (consider also CASA's new definition of aerobatics).
  3. djpacro
    i guess that question had a very specific context? The rules are clearly explained in a series of ACs.
  4. djpacro
    useful to read Reg 212 first ...
  5. djpacro
    yours approved by CASA iaw that reg?
  6. djpacro
    my recollection is that one of the rules states that you only have to be available for SSAA ...
  7. djpacro
    Treat every landing as a xwind landing.
  8. djpacro
    Yep. My flight training business from which I earn taxable income is a private operation.
  9. djpacro
    I dunno Kaz, I thought that there was another law where Yenn, as an employee of the company, could be paid by the company to ferry other employees around as a private op.
  10. djpacro
    Interesting .... CASA has this on their new website despite it being statements from a decade ago: Testing of safety-sensitive personnel for alcohol and other drugs - Answers to common questions | Civil Aviation Safety Authority .... the answer to the first question is relevant, as is the one about a private pilot in the bush ...
  11. djpacro
    Pilots of America has a medical section where you will get help and advice from medical examiners.
  12. djpacro

    FAA

    djpacro replied to Yenn's topic in Governing Bodies

    Its great that they see that as a role but they don't have to - it was removed from their charter after the Valuejet accident.
  13. djpacro
    See https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net351/f/_assets/main/lib100096/foi_f13_5348.pdf
  14. djpacro
    8500 is an important altitude to consider per Request Rejected then the next is when oxygen is required etc
  15. djpacro

    FAA

    djpacro replied to Yenn's topic in Governing Bodies

    The FAA does not "have to promote aviation". I agree that their safety briefings compare favourably with the Safety Digest - a pity that CASA ceased the Safety Digest ages ago as their current magazine is of a much lower standard.
  16. djpacro
    dangerous indeed
  17. djpacro
    please stop spreading the untruth that the US FAA is obliged to promote aviation ...
  18. djpacro
    They put a drop zone dead centre of the recommended VFR coastal route south of Melbourne.
  19. djpacro
    Minimum means minimum - the form is very clear on what is reqd per the regs.
  20. djpacro
    Rounding errors
  21. djpacro
    Doesn't need a right to work, just an operational need. I'd ring Aviation ID Australia | Professional ASIC Distribution Centre rather than CASA. I don't know how you can start the process outside Australia and the police checks will take longer - this has killed a few local businesses.
  22. djpacro
    This is probably going to be all I can find amongst free stuff: http://www.mas.bg.ac.rs/_media/istrazivanje/fme/vol42/2/01_ikostic.pdf - see Figures 32 & 33 with associated text on that page.
  23. djpacro
    A good primer on airfield distance performance factors in Flight Safety Magazine of May-June 2001 https://www.casa.gov.au/file/108561/download?token=MtT8dFkc
  24. djpacro
    that's also my recollection - Henry wanted basically the same wing as the Airtourer but some more wing area and space for fuel in the Aircruiser.Regardless, I'd been looking for some sensible info on these cuffs wrt aerodynamic design of the wing/fuselage junction and effect on stall characteristics. Ideally, the local lift coefficient would be maximum at the outboard end of the cuff so stalls there first. But interference from the fuselage is significant and simple theory not really applicable.
  25. djpacro
    You should see that it is a copy of the Provost wing. Different aerofoil sections root to tip combined with washout designed to give good stall behaviour - didn't quite work as inboard leading edge stall strips were required. The Model T-6 doesn't have those stall strips and, in my opinion, is stretching FAR 23 requirements for uncommanded roll at the stall.See page 13 of http://airtourer.asn.au/airtourer/images/Newsletter/Newsletter%20153.pdf (from memory, not quite right - it is a 23012 not a 2312)
×
×
  • Create New...