While Facthunter is right, as usual, there is a case to be made that some fees are counter-productive. A couple of years ago, a group from Gawler were looking hard at a trip to Broken Hill.
It did not eventuate, and the costs were a definite factor in our decision to can the proposal.
The hard fact is that there are some among us who are reasonably well-off, and others who earn wages and hire club aircraft. Landing fees would definitely add to their difficulties.
So Broken Hill missed out on about a dozen visitors, most of whom would have spent good money in the town.
Personally, I would have been happy with visiting the secondary recreational airfield, but more wanted to land at the town bitumen strip. Dust and prop damage from stones would have been in their thinking.
And , if we had come, what would this have cost the council? The answer is nothing, the airfield is bitumen not grass, yet by us not coming, a few grand was withheld from the town traders.