Jump to content

spenaroo

Members
  • Posts

    427
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by spenaroo

  1. so this is my views and experience, the club culture is changing, there is a lot going on in our lives. The local flight school runs two barbecues I know of, one on Sunday that the old guys attend. and another on Monday nights as part of a study group - this seems to be a mixture, but more young people. which makes sense as we are all in the beginning of our journey. the facebook group for the study sessions is fairly active with young people. Reason for flying - its interesting that whenever we talk about what we want to do at the flight school. however I seem to be the only one who doesn't want to do anything with it. most seem to be wanting to get into the commercial or the PPL side of things. (also seems to be a lot of teens learning to fly when im in the waiting room, but I personally haven't seen the early 20's in the waiting room with me) biggest reason I see is the investment, not just money (which when an hour of dual, is the same cost as my weeks rent is pretty prohibitive) but time, the level of training needed just to go for a couple of circuits solo is considerable. to someone that can only afford to do a lesson every week or two its a long process. sure the minimums are 25 hours... but thats unrealistic unless you can do multiple lessons a week - something young people just don't have time for when working full time and establishing careers. and thats not taking into account the travel time to get to an airfield. Im 2 years into training now, its an ongoing commitment and one that is hard to keep with life changes. its also 2 years of my financial future Ive sacrificed to do it. and then when you have your RPC/RPL (and lets face it the only difference now is the extra few bucks to hire the bigger plane, and a few maths questions on the exam) you are restricted to joy flights in the area around the airfield. trying telling that to people... I spent 15K to get my license and now I can fly the plane, as long as I'm always 30mins from the airport. which is something ill only do once a month - and cause I'll still be renting still need regular check rides. (which is fine, its all I want to do - but try to see that from an average person) then there is the costs to continue to fly. and love to have my own plane, but most of the low budget stuff that would suit the Sunday flyer who just wants to be airborne for an hour and is comparable in price to a "weekend toy" (motorcycle/boat/car lets say $20K) is tail-wheel.... Its an extra endorsement and one you have to go looking for and travel to get. the Value just isnt there, for recreational flying there needs to be bang for buck. and there is too much bucks for a limited bang. it isn't accessible as a Hobby anymore, and its not geared towards that. Id be interested to see how gliding compares as its something that people go into without the end goal of doing trips to remote parts of Australia or as a career. maybe look at that as a model to follow. lets compare it to boating (my family's hobby). its $300 for the license, the boat is 10-20K - but you can store it in the backyard. servicing is minimal and any mechanic can do it. there is still the travel to water. but I can have as many people as I like come along. so it now turns into time with family and friends, so its easy to justify as opposed to just myself.
  2. not Lockheed. lets not forget the mars rover that crashed because NASA assumed the inputs were in metric, as per the standard practices for space flight
  3. better question is why they still call it Imperial? doesn't that go against there whole culture of freedumbs and independence
  4. NASA uses metric. From memory the Apollo missions were all done in metric, with it converted to imperial for the read-outs
  5. yeah, to do anything other than an oil change you have to remove the tank. which is a bummer when customers have just fueled up on the way in to service old days you would jut turn off the fuel tap and disconnect the lines. new bike with fuel pumps that bolt in from below will run a quick disconnect because of the pressure in the fuel system. few different styles, some have the ends threaded into the pump (Ducati and triumph style), others have one side cast in the pump plate or tank. (the Harleys from memory had a quick connect on the fuel line, but was just a tube coming off the tank - so needed to be drained every time you took the tank off) most bikes after about 5 years have issues with the plastic connections breaking with removal or refitting due to the plastic turning brittle. I keep about 3 sets in stock for this reason. the 916-998, 1098-1198 are all at the age where they break during services
  6. motorcycle fittings, most bikes with a fuel pump run quick connect fittings. I know Triumph and Ducati do, and of course with the fuel tank over the hot engines it has the shut-off. with aftermarket metal fittings widely available (the stock ones are plastic and break on removal) https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/333178511422
  7. instructors are still allowed to fly to keep ratings. there was some pics of the instructors in the Lilydale vixxens on Facebook.
  8. Good point, not to mention the problem is also a tunnel with clear entry and exit paths. All our tunnels seem to be in city's to bypass city traffic. The tunnels in Melbourne are all 3 lane, as is the one exiting Adelaide.
  9. It all depends how you lift a bike up, if you use the proper technique and maximize your leverage its possible. back when I worked at a Harley dealership we did ladies only nights. one of the activities was putting a bike on its side over rubber matting. demonstrating the proper way to lift. and then getting a lady from the crowd to then lift it by herself.
  10. The Vought F-8 Crusader (originally F8U) is a single-engine, supersonic, carrier-based air superiority jet aircraft built by Vought for the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps (replacing the Vought F7U Cutlass), and for the French Navy. The first F-8 prototype was ready for flight in February 1955. The F-8 served principally in the Vietnam War. The Crusader was the last American fighter with guns as the primary weapon, earning it the title "The Last of the Gunfighters". The RF-8 Crusader was a photo-reconnaissance development and operated longer in U.S. service than any of the fighter versions. RF-8s played a crucial role in the Cuban Missile Crisis, providing essential low-level photographs impossible to acquire by other means. United States Navy Reserve units continued to operate the RF-8 until 1987. In September 1952, the United States Navy announced a requirement for a new fighter. It was to have a top speed of Mach 1.2 at 30,000 ft (9,144.0 m) with a climb rate of 25,000 ft/min (127.0 m/s), and a landing speed of no more than 100 mph (160 km/h). Korean War experience had demonstrated that 0.50 inch (12.7 mm) machine guns were no longer sufficient and as a result the new fighter was to carry a 20 mm (0.79 in) cannon. 4x20 mm had become Navy standard prior to the Korean war: F2H, F9F, F3D and also the F7U and F4D, among others, preceded the F8U. In response, the Vought team led by John Russell Clark, created the V-383. Unusual for a fighter, the aircraft had a high-mounted wing which necessitated the use of a fuselage-mounted short and light landing gear. The major contribution to the short main gear, however, was the variable incidence wing that meant the plane did not take off and land extremely nose up, which was a characteristic of swept and low aspect ratio winged fighters. The Crusader was powered by a Pratt and Whitney J57 turbojet engine. The engine was equipped with an afterburner which, on the initial production F8U-1 aircraft, increased the thrust of the engine from 10,200 lb to 16,000 lb, but, unlike later engines, had no intermediate thrust settings. The Crusader was the first jet fighter in US service to reach 1,000 mph; U.S. Navy pilot R.W. Windsor reached 1,015 mph on a flight in 1956. The most innovative aspect of the design was the variable-incidence wing which pivoted by 7° out of the fuselage on takeoff and landing (not to be confused with variable-sweep wing). This allowed a greater angle of attack, increasing lift without compromising forward visibility. This innovation helped the F-8's development team win the Collier Trophy in 1956. Simultaneously, the lift was augmented by leading-edge flaps drooping by 25° and inboard flaps extending to 30°. The rest of the aircraft took advantage of contemporary aerodynamic innovations with area-ruled fuselage, all-moving stabilators, dog-tooth notching at the wing folds for improved yaw stability, and liberal use of titanium in the airframe. The armament, as specified by the Navy, consisted primarily of four 20 mm (.79 in) autocannons; the Crusader happened to be the last U.S. fighter designed with guns as its primary weapon. They were supplemented with a retractable tray with 32 unguided Mk 4/Mk 40 Folding-Fin Aerial Rocket (Mighty Mouse FFARs), and cheek pylons for two guided AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missiles. In practice, AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles were the F-8's primary weapon; the 20mm guns were "generally unreliable". Moreover, it achieved nearly all of its kills with Sidewinders. Vought also presented a tactical reconnaissance version of the aircraft called the V-392. Major competition came from the Grumman F-11 Tiger, the upgraded twin-engine McDonnell F3H Demon (which would eventually become the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II), and lastly, the North American F-100 Super Sabre hastily adapted to carrier use and dubbed the "Super Fury". In May 1953, the Vought design was declared a winner and in June, Vought received an order for three XF8U-1 prototypes (after adoption of the unified designation system in September 1962, the F8U became the F-8). The first prototype flew on 25 March 1955 with John Konrad at the controls. The aircraft exceeded the speed of sound during its maiden flight. The development was so trouble-free that the second prototype, along with the first production F8U-1, flew on the same day, 30 September 1955. On 4 April 1956, the F8U-1 performed its first catapult launch from Forrestal. By the end of production, 1219 aircraft had been built. For more details on the origins, development, operational history and 27 variants, click here.
  11. well done, congrats on the achievement
  12. spenaroo

    GAF Jindivik

    the Pika seems like such a cool thing to fly, anyone have any information from what it was like?
  13. Doesn't matter.... Registration is on the side of the aircraft. But the tunnel cameras are all forward or rear facing
  14. thats something I did when learning to hold-off. went into the flare and was told to add just enough power to keep the wheels from touching, have done it a few times to get my eye in and used to the feeling. so im not as nervous of the ground. but doing it at cruise speed is something else
  15. and this is an example of the different water jackets, here is a ZX14 cylinder and a STX15F which is the PWC version of the engine admittedly the pictures are awful. but you can see the larger porting for the water to run through. my wording wasn't the clearest, I meant thinner walls of the water jackets.
  16. Yes, coolant has many protective qualities with preventing corrosion and anti-freeze but it also helps with heat, if its not boiling - its not building up pressure for the radiator cap to take effect. distilled water is fine for casual track bikes as they don't sit idle and always have airflow through the radiator to keep the temps under control. you wouldn't want to ride one in traffic though. the proper race bikes will run a non-glycol based coolant, so they get the benefits of the higher boiling point without the drawbacks of slippery messes on the track when it all goes wrong. the endurance riders who do lots of high revs at low speeds will use water-less coolant that doesn't boil to 190*C
  17. Not saying it cant be done - there are a few one-offs in racecars. but its so much time and effort, and almost done exclusively simply because they wanted to engineer something different. or its a backyarder that had the engine there already.
  18. okay let me put this another way, Rotax are owned by BRP. BRP also own Evinrude, Johnson and Sea-Doo If it was as simple as modifying the marine engines to an aircraft - wouldn't you think they would have done it so save millions in research. ive seen plenty of motorcycle engines marinised for PWC's. but only the Konig done the other way around. with the exception of a few one-off drag bikes... but they had problems with the cooling system and cooked the motors after a few minutes total run time despite electric pumps and large radiators. the engines are designed for constant flow of cool water, an endless supply from the ocean/lake. they can exchange far more heat through the fluid and run thinner water jackets, as opposed to closed loop systems where the fluid is always at a warm temperature. (which is why we run coolant to increase the boiling point past that of water) closest bet would be a seadoo motor (1600cc, supercharged at 300HP) they run a closed loop system for the engine (using the ride plate submerged in water as a heat exchange) but even they use the surrounding water to cool the inter-cooler and exhaust.
  19. Cooling will be the bike issue, same problem with adapting an outboard to power a motorcycle. "Outboard motors are cooled by water circulated from the surface they are racing on, which means the coolant temperature is always low and heat can be dissipated quickly. This isn’t the case with liquid cooled land-based engines, which re-circulate the coolant through a radiator. Temperatures are controlled, but the coolant remains relatively (scalding) hot – if the coolant passages and water jackets aren’t designed to deal with this elevated temperature you run into problems... Which is exactly what happened with the König motor. Through trial and error an effective radiator system was developed along with a unique cooling system for the crankcases. Normally liquid cooled engines only need to directly cool the barrels and sometimes the heads. Two-strokes, however, route their fuel charge through the crankcases before being sucked into cylinders. If the crankcases get too hot, the intake charge gets overheated and power suffers. This was a problem with the König, so Kim developed a clever liquid-cooled magnesium sump bolted to the bottom of the engine to keep temperatures in check." https://www.odd-bike.com/2013/04/konig-500-gp-outboard-powered-underdog.html
  20. oddly enough I want to go in the opposite direction, had a 1999 NB, still my favorite car I've owned and the one I should have never sold. (full exhaust, cold air intake, reinforced fender arms, reinforced chassis rails, reinforced transmission crossover, strut braces, roll bar) I want to get a sprite. because its still an affordable vintage car, and I reckon they just look like fun.
  21. would you rather fly a spitfire or a cirrus jet? would you rather have an Ferrari 308, or a modern hot hatch? the newer stuff is far more functional and performs better.... but it doesn't have the same emotional appeal
  22. yeah, I learnt it from a chat with my brother. He wanted to buy a motorcycle, I had a couple spare at the time that I offered him full use of (just pay rego) his response is that while he knew it was reliable and higher performance... it just didn't have the look he wanted when he saw his reflection in the window. And he is completely right, at the end of the day we do this stuff because of how it makes us feel. if we were chasing numbers we'd jump on a commercial flight instead.
  23. can we all just agree that they win in the all important wank factor. lets face it, at the end of the day being able to look back at the aircraft and have bragging rights important. we are all a little vein. and there is the old adage, if it looks good - it'll perform good
  24. military aircraft, they aren't worried about passenger comfort was just listening to a podcast on the c17, it can pull 2.5G.
×
×
  • Create New...