So, Barry Hempel was
-a great all round guy and great pilot
OR
- a bit of a barnstormer prepared to risk others
He was
- fully licenced to take paying passengers
OR
- he had restrictions of some sort on his licence
The Yak
- had no problems
OR
- fell out of sky due to mechanical issues
Yet to see any comment WITH EVIDENCE backing up which of the above apply.
He might have been the nicest guy in the world, but IF he had some problems, where was his personal responsibility hiding when taking up paying passengers (including my daughter, for a joyride on her 18th birthday, a month before his fatal crash)?
I met Barry a few times, and he was the nicest guy, and upon learning about my daughter's interest in flying, wanted to help and mentor her.
BUT.
The buck stops with him eventually, as it must with all of us pilots, when deciding to fly or not.
Hiding behind doctors, or saying, 'it really doesn't apply to me, cause I know better', doesn't cut the mustard.
Was he fully licenced? Don't know, but it was never mentioned when we were organising the surprise joy flight.
When my daughter and I were interviewed by an accident investigator after his accident, I must admit I got pretty angry when I was told about his licence circumstances, and the risk she was placed under.
So yeah, all round nice guy, but it boils down in my view to personal responsibility, towards yourself and others. Didn't see that demonstrated that day.