Jump to content

Flying Binghi

Members
  • Posts

    661
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Flying Binghi

  1. Oh, i see. Your the one claiming my links are biased (as to what?) and not offering up reasoning for it. As to "listening"... seems I am barely able to get a post in edge ways between the distracter post thread bombardment from other posters. via facthunter, "...Coal is over, Binjhi. It's near impossible to get anyone to invest in it..." Via focusing on one country alone I have clearly demonstrated in this thread via the links to recent Indian commentary on the massive doubling in their current coal rail network and the building of whole new rail lines to new Indian coal mines that this is not the case. There is also the fact that an Indian based company is looking to establish more coal mines in Australia to further help India get power to the 250,000,000 Indians that do not currently have access to cheap reliable coal based power. Just waving a hand and claiming coal is over and that we should just build wind towers is not only Not looking at the facts, it is bordering on a religious type of deliberate ignorance of the facts. .
  2. My definition is its just a child's day dream. Sorta like when yer 5 and them airfix aircraft really are flying around the room...
  3. If it were so simple I'm sure the judge would have decided the case in a day. The judges comments suggest otherwise... "I want someone of substantial stature and experience ... who's got the forensic background for this type of dispute.” .
  4. The so-called reef 'damage' is being used as a weapon to stop the building of a north Queensland airport. The reef 'damage' claims are also affecting the tourism that supports many aviation jobs. facthunter, do you disagree ? .
  5. Yeah, sorta like the global warming scam where university professors should never rock the gravy train boat or they will be hounded out... .
  6. You will have proof of that eh, fly_tornado And where is that link from danny_galaga... .
  7. ? Are you saying the link I posted is biased or that I am biased and use links that support my writings ? .
  8. Here's a youtube vid showing Peter Ridd and others discussing a few things. A Marine Physicist. And apparently he were the Chief Marine Physicist of the University... .
  9. Is that like in them old Mad comics where the shadow told the true story.. .
  10. "Looking at you references, Not hard to see why you are so one eyed..." How so ? .
  11. I suspect the Russians are looking to the near future when many of the silly western nations have urgent need of stop gap power to make up for the massive short falls of the eco-loon wind and sunbeam power. If they develop a fleet of nuclear power station ships that can be dispatched to any port in a mater of weeks they will start rakeing in the money... well, they are already. Russian gas is powering Europe right now... .
  12. "...Renewables Rip-Off: Despite $4 Billion in Annual Subsidies, Wind & Solar Delivers a Trivial 2% of Australia’s Power Demand..." "...Ex-Nationals senator Ron Boswell wrote in “The Australian” today, (19 April 2018), making the point that the RET is failing us and forcing electricity prices through the roof, putting ordinary folk in energy poverty and destroying businesses..." Renewables Rip-Off: Despite $4 Billion in Annual Subsidies, Wind & Solar Delivers a Trivial 2% of Australia’s Power Demand .
  13. danny_galaga, did I miss the link to this 'quote' of yours.. ? .
  14. From reef to insurence. Diversionary panic what.. And for those that don't read the post that I'm referencing here. The post from call-sign danny_galaga is referencing insurence... "...Warren Buffett slammed for dismissing climate change as potential worry for insurers Environmental activists are not buying Buffet’s arguments..." Green Fury at Warren Buffett’s Climate Heresy .
  15. "...Ontogenetic Effect...". A link to where you found that please danny_galaga As to credibility of what you posted - Peter Ridd is going to court to retain his position. So the claim of "Did James Cook remove tenure? Um, no" does not stand up to scrutiny. So as to the credibilitie of the rest of it... We'll soon have the court records to peruse.. From my prior link - After some reflection over the last couple of months, and some thousands of dollars on legal fees... Professor Ridd has decided to fight the final censure. Peter Ridd Asks for your Help - Now - Jennifer Marohasy .
  16. Whatever it is it looks similar to the aircraft that sat unflown and rotting out on the tie down line near Gil Layts school at YBAF for many years.
  17. Re - naval aircraft factory n3n-3 Reminds me of an Avro Cadet I seen at Chewing Gum field out the back of the Gold Coast. Though I think they had the motor sitting well forward.
  18. Actually, I think the Sikorsky Firefly were the first man carrying electric helicopter. (Yeah, I know. It's an old thread)
  19. Dunno what it is though it has nice lines. An early Mk of a Stearman perhaps ? .
  20. Might just need a bit of Inox/CRC sprayed around parts.
  21. Heh, you obviously haven't had much to do with researching the subject. Anyone questioning the 'consensus' gets hit with a barrage of diversion and abuse. Much so-called climate science is paywalled or simply not allowed to be accessed. An example of what I have alluded to in this and prior posts... Professor Peter Ridd is a physicist at James Cook University who has dared to question scientific findings that purport to show the Great Barrier Reef is in trouble. Specifically, he has been formally censured by the University and told to remain quiet about the matter – or risk his job. The issue dates back to August 2017, and comments he made on television promoting the book I edited... Peter wrote the first chapter in this book, and in it he suggests that there are major problems with quality assurance when it comes to claims of the imminent demise of the reef. He has also published in the scientific literature detailing his concerns about the methodology used to measure calcification rates, including a technical paper in Marine Geology (volume 65). Peter Ridd Asks for your Help - Now - Jennifer Marohasy .
  22. No one said they were saints, just astute. And as to patents - pay the dues and get the rights of usage.
  23. Yep, grandfather of mine run a push bike shop back early last century so I found the Wright Brothers to be a fascinating study. The trouble though with your background of the Wright Brothers is with today's eco-loons they would need peer reveiwed research, a university degree, and a university job before they would be allowed to comment on anything aviation related. And then if their views did not agree with the consensus they would be hounded out of their jobs. And the Wright Brothers were back yard tinkerers... Back to the thread.. .
  24. Whoa, so much vitriol my way. Though, not all bad as nowadays what were once called Heritics by the true believers are now called trolls... As to Ontogenetic Effect. I'm sure Jaba-who is looking into it now and wondering why it were not mentioned in that university presentation he attended. .
×
×
  • Create New...