Jump to content

nomadpete

Members
  • Posts

    901
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by nomadpete

  1. Again I say we can't expect to only adopt a part of somebody else's successful system and expect success. For instance if we go the USA way we would have to adopt the whole scheme including all the bells and whistles that they have. EG: more radar and ATC - much bigger than we have now. And the upper layer of what we presently call "G" (is Dick pushing for E over C?). Do we have enough traffic to warrant the infrastructure expense?
  2. What I'm saying is that the increasing tightness of regulation (& consequential rising cost) is customer driven. You only have to look at the diminishing number of humble fun aircraft, to see that. There are so many "mini GA looking" aircraft out there. And they are getting seriously long hours on their airframes. Not at all like the simple, early rag and tube planes. And since the majority of new pilots "just want to fly", there is a diminishing number that want (&have the skills) to do maintenance properly, let alone to successfully build an aircraft without making some basic mistakes which might not even show up until it comes to bite the next owner. Our organisation has to try to deal with that changing environment. It's not only about the cowboy element. I've seen GA pilots behave badly too. The old crash comics often featured them.
  3. Unfortunately, Nev, our incoming "new blood" is of a generation that has no interest in ever building an aircraft. They are very unlikely to ever pick up a fraction of the general knowledge that most of us oldies take for granted. They don't have the attention span to commit to long term work toward a goal that is recreational. Worst of all they actually need the nanny state to look after them. These people are our future. (Specifically the future of RAA). Unfortunately our organisation is forced to evolve to cope with it. I don't like it but i accept the younger generation is indirectly moulding my future.
  4. Yeah, but it keeps the conversation going.....
  5. Sorry, that wasn't meant to sound personal. YTWB is not likely to be closed due to expensive anti-terror measures. It was just a questioning thought bubble about the problem of the airports destiny.
  6. So, M Newbery, what should TRC do with the old Toowoomba airport. It's really not the best airport I've flown into. Has it reached the end of its useful life?
  7. Don't like being forced down too close to ground. My instructor always warned me to stay away from the edges of the sky.
  8. Thanks, Kaz So the USA system relies heavily on a much bigger, more exy radar network. Not going to happen in Aus. (Unless we cut subsidising casa and spend that money on safety infrastructure)
  9. Sea transport may be cheap, but is slow and is still plagued by the problem of trying to create a speedy interface with trucking distribution at the destination. Sorry. This has nothing to do with Dick's 'rant'. Back to topic. The problem with trying to copy some other system (USA), is that for it to be a success, we would have to adopt the complete system. Unfortunately our bureaucrats have never done that in the past. They only 'cherry pick' bits and pieces. Then everyone cries out 'See! It didn't work!' I don't know if Dick is on the right track or not. Our country is more (demographically) like Canada than USA. Does Canada use the USA model?
  10. Yes, sailing teaches a lot about the swirls and Eddie's around terrain. Some are predictable, some are not. Also there are sometimes sudden gusts that interrupt the relatively stable Eddie's, capable of giving momentary radical changes to apparent airspeed. It would not take much to align the Swiss cheese unpleasantly, especially when flight path options are restricted by steeply rising ground.
  11. Viability depends on the terminal infrastructure. The interface between rail transit and trucking distribution is what makes or breaks a long distance freight system. I hope that there is some serious planning going into the interface. Our country needs more proper (standard gauge) rail infrastructure. But no Australian government has shown leadership in long term planning, ever.
  12. Thank you for diverting this Avenue of debate onto it's own thread.
  13. I just hope that these experts don't get to hear that there are thousands of private airstrips out there. And none of them are "security protected".
  14. Regarding the original question, my pondering brings me to question the influence of heat reflection (from roofs), on atmospheric thermal activity. I note that asphalt absorbs heat very well. There is a lot of asphalt in new estates. Absorbed heat = higher re-radiated heat later in the day. Gliders often (in treed bush) find the last thermal of the day comeing from the release of heat stored in foliage. I'd suspect that the matrix of roads would create a layer of warm air just right to set off a thermal. I've sometimes found good air (rising air) by following a highway.
  15. Is there any other kind? Happy and safe new year everyone. Make the most of the festive season to be with the important people in your life.
  16. Frank, Did you bring them back, too? Welcome to the forum, Andy
  17. Is there a procedure for the aircraft to take off from the beach (once CASA have been reassured that the motor is functioning)? What I mean is, aren't there rules that prohibit operation from the beach? Or must the A/C be derigged and trailered out?
  18. Thank you Ian, Corinne and the Family. All of you contribute in your own way (however indirectly)) to this site. We mostly appreciate that this site gives us a voice. Merry silly season to you all. Thank you!
  19. Don't waste your time calling His name. He's just sitting back laughing at you. Who do you think sent that gust anyways?
  20. Hi Dave, I'd gladly take you for a fly, but I have a similar problem as Marty. Only worse because my incomplete aircraft is up in sunny Qld. And I'm leaving tomorrow to go finish it. You might be able to go for a fly in a Jabiru at Cambridge (near HBA), but I'm pretty sure they want more than a bottle of Red. And, Marty, what are you doing on the forum anyway? You're supposed to be totally absorbed in the European atmosphere. And shouldn't have time to chat on a forum on the other side of the planet !
  21. Yes, we had a glider seat almost set alight by sun being concentrated by an open canopy.
  22. Hello to you from Tasmania. There are quite a few of us down here. Welcome to the Southern Island branch of the forum.
  23. Darn. All I saw today was a couple of crows and a wedgetail
  24. I am biased against the clearly biased treatment given to loud Harleys. It always seems to be Harleys that are so loud. Recently I took my Yamaha Virago (stop sniggering) down to the bike shop to get a roadworthy. The guy knocked it back "Sorry pal, that's 6dB over the limit, can't give it a roadworthy." I was fuming. He them rubbed salt into the wound when I spluttered "Hey, it's not nearly as loud as those Harleys", His response was "I like your bike's note, But the Harleys are a different case" Seems to me nobody is game to upset the HD riders. They do seem to be fragile whenever anyone criticizes HD's OK I know my rant is not about Patriots, nor about flying. Sorry for the thread drift.
  25. Party pooper. I love aircraft noise, but the majority of suburbanites don't. I love the thunder of an open throttle, but the majority of suburbanites dont. I especially love the sound of seven pistons radially fighting without the aid of a muffler, too. Even Better, two rows of them. I guess that makes me 'basic' by your definition. Well I do, if it isn't as persistent as a leaf blower or jetski.
×
×
  • Create New...