fly_tornado Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Rotax just caused a stir in the AirVenture media center with the announcement of the turbocharged 915is. Essentially a turbo version of the popular 912iS, the new 915iS should be available in the second half of 2017. Rotax says take off power is available to 15,000 ft, and that’s 135 hp at 5800 rpm using 98 RON gasoline (95 RON is the minimum required; 100LL is acceptable). Torque is also increased, as Rotax said a new PSRU gearbox is used, but a torque rating was not immediately announced. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Getting a fair bit away from a simple motor that you can diagnose yourself. The 80 HP 912.version will remain the most reliable of them all. Nev 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetjr Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Hate to think of th cost at $0.70 usd But sounds like a close to modern engine 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDQDI Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Turbo as well as electronic ignition, the potential is certainly there for great results. Hopefully it doesn't have too many bugs. Couple it with a constant speed prop and you have the potential for a very economical cruiser, albeit, as FH alluded to, with a few more things that could go wrong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetjr Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 www.recreationalflying.com/threads/rotax-announces-new-135-hp-turbocharged-engine.136955 85kg DRY !! going to be heavy when add IFA prop and wet stuff. Intercooled too Not available for 2 years or so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavalon48 Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 seen this blog yesterday ROTAX 915 IS: BRP UNVEILS A NEW TURBOCHARGED ROTAX AIRCRAFT ENGINE Written by Rotax-Owner font size Print Email Add new comment BRP introduces a more powerful 135-hp Rotax aircraft engine at the EAA AirVenture in Oshkosh, Wisconsin – the Rotax 915 iS. Oshkosh / Wisconsin, U.S.A., July 21, 2015 – BRP introduces a more powerful 135-hp Rotax aircraft engine at the EAA AirVenture in Oshkosh, Wisconsin – the Rotax 915 iS. Based on the proven concept of the Rotax 912 / 914 engine series, the Rotax 915 iS engine offers more power, the best power-to-weight ratio in its class and full take-off power up to at least 15,000 feet (4,570 m) with a service ceiling of 23,000 feet (7,010 m). “This more powerful aircraft engine – the Rotax 915 iS – was specifically requested by our customers. It opens the market to larger, heavier aircraft, larger gyrocopters and even small helicopters, or simply more performance for current applications,” said Thomas Uhr, vice president BRP-Powertrain and general manager BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG. “BRP’s Rotax 4-stroke aircraft engines are already industry leaders; opening other markets represents a good growth opportunity.” The introduction of the Rotax 915 iS engine, a 4-stroke, 4-cylinder turbocharged aircraft engine with intercooler and a redundant fuel injection system, is in response to market demand for a modern, more powerful engine allowing higher payload and shorter take-offs. It delivers the most advanced aircraft engine technology resulting in low operating cost and ease of use. The serial production of the Rotax 915 iS engine is scheduled for second half of 2017. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION • 4-cylinder • 4-stroke liquid/air-cooled engine with opposed cylinders • Dry sump forced lubrication with separate oil tank, automatic adjustment by hydraulic, valve tappet • Redundant electronic fuel injection, ignition, ECU • Engine management system • Electric starter • Propeller speed reduction gearbox • Air intake system • Turbocharger and intercooler • Target TBO (Time between overhauls) 2,000 hours • Efficiency: 280 - 310 g/kWh BFSC at 5,500 rpm • Service Ceiling of 23,000 feet BEST POWER TO WEIGHT RATIO! FULL TAKE OFF POWER UP TO AT LEAST 15,000 FEET! EXTENSION OF 912/914 ENGINE FAMILY - PROVEN RELIABILITY! WITH MORE THAN 50 MILLION FLIGHT HOURS The 915iS will be available second half of 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultralights Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 that engine, in a J230 airframe, will be a bulletproof reliable, fast and well performing aircraft..... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 But if you are looking for something in the J230 airframe how about a turbo direct drive flat four aero engine already available at 74kg? not quite the fun factor of fuel injection and its about 20g/Kwh more on fuel burn at cruise ... but its got even less to go wrong, its lighter and available now. And consider that at around 100hp cruise that's 2kg of fuel more per hour ... so the R915 does not make back the extra 10kg of engine until hour 5 ... and those 5 hours have cost you 14L of extra petrol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Downunder Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 that engine, in a J230 airframe, will be a bulletproof reliable, fast and well performing aircraft..... Absoulutely agree....... But do you think it will ever happen? Not under the current ownership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Downunder Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Getting a fair bit away from a simple motor that you can diagnose yourself. The 80 HP 912.version will remain the most reliable of them all. Nev I wonder how successful a 6 cyl with the small capacity 80hp cylinders but 100hp comp ratio would have been. May have reved to 6000 continuous or more. I can't help think Rotax are over complicating these newer engines. I like the sds type injection....pretty simple. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultralights Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 after flying behind rotax now for 1000's of hours, i dont think they are overly complicated, once you know what your looking at, they are surprisingly simple. and the proof of the overly complicated engines being reliable is in the hours they have flown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly_tornado Posted July 22, 2015 Author Share Posted July 22, 2015 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRviator Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 That'd make a really nice engine in the RV-9. A little tail heavy, but not overly so, and 120HP in the low teens on Mogas makes a cheap cross country cruiser! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerin Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 I'm betting the price will be approaching the cost of the rest of the aircraft, but EFI and intercooled turbo are mature technologies. Despite the much higher parts count, modern turbo efi engines are more reliable and efficient than the old carburetted engines in ground based vehicles. More to go wrong does not necessarily translate into less reliable (and rarely does these days). More parts are often needed to increase reliability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultralights Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 havnt heard of anyone thinking of putting one in a RV12 yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
planesmaker Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Rotax already produce a good engine that fits nicely in the the j230. Just got to get jabiru to take their blinkers off. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
planesmaker Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Rotax already produce a good engine that fits nicely in the the j230. Just got to get jabiru to take their blinkers off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetjr Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Great engines no doubt but cost and weight are a big issue, suggest this one might push past $40K inc prop, thats double a similar spec conventional offering. Then your into discussing value and risk, and the debate isnt crystal clear. Whilst complexity may not necessarily mean unreliability it sure adds to repair cost and greatly raises risk IF something does go wrong. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Page Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Who ever is at Oshkosh... Keep your eyes pealed for a D-Motor.. The six should be out. It is high torque slow revving just perfect for direct drive to prop. Fluid cooled hence no snap cooling after a slow hard climb. Regards KP 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maritime_Ev Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Good on Rotax moving forward, with both the turbo (in the 914) and the EFI (in the 912iS) already flying it may not even have too many glitches to start off with. I guess it would make nice combo with a Sling 4 or perhaps another modern 4 seater (or maybe even in a C172, would the turbo and CS prop make up for the 25hp it has less than a standard 172?). I remember reading about a six cilinder Rotax a long time ago, I guess that didn't get anywhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Rotax are continuing to develop the original concept engine obviously for cost reasons. This could eventually cause unreliability as it's still much the same engine in there doing the work. Comment on the SIX cylinder v/s Four. Smoothness is much better with the sixes as there is NO time where all pistons are stationary at once, in a six and it happens TWICE each revolution in a four. (in line or flat) Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly_tornado Posted July 24, 2015 Author Share Posted July 24, 2015 turbo charging the 912IS is an obvious step. adding a new gearbox with a new vibration dampening system will also fix some issues. I wonder if the 915 gearbox will end up replacing the 912 one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pylon500 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Missed this thread somehow, but came upon the 915 via write-ups from Oshkosh. The best comment I saw was "Rotax have taken all the most expensive bits of all their engines, and combined them into one engine!" I think that will pretty much sum up the price when we get it.... Was a shame the Rotax V-6 never went anywhere, and I've always thought they made an engineering error by not making the 912 with full crossflow heads. The move from a flat four to a flat six would have been a non event. Imagine, 1.8 litre, turbo'ed, 150/160hp, and turbine smooth...... Would it be a 918, or a 924? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 I think they are just wringing all they can from the original, and may come a gutsa. The market is price sensitive and complexity averse.Nev 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Downunder Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 A flat 6 would have more compatable parts with the 4 than a v6 and gain favourable marketing leverage off the flat four cylinder I think. Building on a brilliant design etc...... Rotax are laughing all the way to the bank and are just lucky one of the "big four" Japnese manufacturers have'nt ventured into the field. The data the japs must have gained on engines over the past 30 years must be staggering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now