Kenlsa

There are a couple of “STOL” Jabs around, though 19 built. The SP 470/500 fuse with the 450kg UL wings, powered by the 3300. We had one on our airfield for years. With the 35kt stall it was ok in the relatively short field landing phase and with the 3300 took off like a rocket. ”19” is a great category Ken

Wooden prop should use Belleville washers, just like the jab wooden prop. 72 inch pounds of torque Ken

I have yet to purchase mine and claim the rebate. If it’s anything like transferring a VH registered plane to a new owner, me, there was 8 pages of instructions so I could fill out a 2 page document. Unbelievable. Ken

I was listening to a psychologist a while back who said that nature has developed and reinforced the fear of heights for our species survival . If we stand at the edge of a cliff, we need to protect ourselves so adrenaline kicks in, the ‘Fright’ part, to stop us there before taking action or to back away. Same with being at the top of the tree. Apparently we are physically connected to the ground (safety) through our senses - we see the potential problem, but we feel the solution because we still keep our feet on the ground/tree keeping us based. This has been passed through the generations for ever. BUT , flying (not falling) has not been implanted in our DNA as unsafe, as it is not a naturally occurring situation. Children won’t be afraid of it as it only becomes a learned fear, through their own experience or relayed information from others. It was an interesting article Ken

5 k range Bruce, not far enough when they require a 10nm call to inform others of your intentions Ken

Some feel that 760 implementation is taking too long, but for me and my Colt, I have got my rego number from RAOz so it is moving along. I am just about to start the fabric, so I’m not to worried about the speed of 760 development. I have spoken to the managers at RAOz and I am just waiting for the prefix to my rego number. This should be 34 for certified aircraft. This has yet to be approved by CASA as part of the operating/tech manuals that will include some other requirements that I don’t know of I’m guessing. it’s all happening so all good. Ken

I think it’s time

He is away for Christmas but we lifted the fuel about 1.3m from the ground to a fuel cap at the top of the boot cowl on a Mini Cab Ken

A mate uses this model and it works very well. I will get one for my Colt when it is finished Ken

We run glider training as well at Gawler. All should be aware that gliders may be flying contrary to normal circuit direction. Not unusual to turn left on take off in a powered plane then to watch the glider turn right after launch. Then the tug will be Released at 2500ft then it will rapidly descend to 500 feet and land on any runway they want, but the runway is usually one that permits a rapid hook up of the next glider. An aircraft carrier has nothing on our operation. ken

RFguy, how would a sonex turbo go? They work at the rpm you need and not too much boost to normalise for the MAP you need. Ken

Bruce, I see that you still own the SK. Ken

Gawler has bunk accommodation available

Our club ROKO with a 912 was time expired but only 900 hours on it. Liaised with RAoz who said that we could convert to Experimental. So we did that. We put an ‘E’ before the number 24 on the rego. Just ring RAoz

Some of the UL450 were limited to a single 45lt tank. I wonder if this was one? Ken

That was from a near by field. Into IMC and tore off a wing from memory. Ken

I seem to remember that one of the big problems, only a couple of years ago, was with the LHD. During rough seas operations, there wasn’t enough movement in the rotors to help compensate for the rocking of the landing deck, therefore over stressing the landing gear….the pitch changes overtook the ability of the pilot to control it. Ken

I kit built a SP500 (18 months to build, one hour every day and 6 hours per weekend) If I were to do it again I would build a j230 and set it up to fly it at 700 or 760 under the new rules for my latest build I have decided to rebuild a certified aircraft, though that can be spendy as you have to use certified and TSO’d or PMA’d parts and any modifications have to be STC’d. Though I am having fun doing it. if this is your first….go j230 Ken

Let’s just support one of our forum members. Ken

I hope everyone fills out the survey Ken

We manage our airfield for the council, they are happy with this as they keep any interaction with us to a minimum. If we don’t go to them with any headaches, they will allow us to operate. We don’t charge landing fees for sport aircraft as we expect a reciprocal fee waiver from others at their fields. we charge any commercial flight $10 per engine. We also charge our private owners (90 of us) $50 per year landing fee. This is separate from our hangar site cost. But a quick napkin cost structure of the NON FLYING portion of our operations is substantial. Rates, insurance, maintenance and salary for a site manager is over $100k plus volunteers who slash, repair fences etc Note this does not include any flight operation that is double that amount. This seems to work for us as everywhere in our normal flying destinations are reciprocal…..all good. BUT, just think of a council that RUNs the operation that doesn’t have a reciprocal agreement with other sites (why would they as they are the council) they have to get get their $100 plus cost back somehow. They are not going to throw away rate payers cash. I often hear that visiting pilots spend up BIG in town adding to the council and business coffers but I have yet to observe many/any calling a taxi to get a pub meal, shopping etc. Most just grab a coffee and leave, putting it a a destination in their log book. The only exception I have noted is if it is a major event that most fields only conduct every 2 years. The money must come from somewhere. $100k has to be recouped somehow. User pays. Ken

Evidence, not hearsay thanks. ONLY direct evidence given by the person who actually saw or heard the incident, counts. All the rest: ‘I was told, did you hear, I heard that, he was actually there and he said to me ‘ is called hearsay. I used to do this for a living. So no more unless you are in a position to give direct evidence. Then I am happy to hear it. Ken

We keep revisiting this RAOz :company, business, association, limited by, club, AUF, better in the old days, my opinion doesn’t count, castles, no longer for members etc etc etc. and of course Jabirus are crap 🙂 I was a member in the AUF days, saw and voted for development of RAOz and the absolute stuff up with records and systems that stopped us flying. I voted for the new RAOz that has got us on the table with the grownups. I complete every survey, write letters to the editor, talk by email and phone to the tech and ops staff. I attend every info session when they come to visit our club. I am involved. I own, fly and continue to build planes. I have to say that I am more than satisfied with the state of affairs at the moment. Sure, most of the members (and just how many of you are actually members anyway and not disgruntled ex wannabes) did not vote for the last change (as they were lazy, didn’t care or were happy to be led)? Sometimes I wonder how many of you actually fly. Only those who really cared voted and the new system was supported by those who had skin in the game—owners and potential owners. If you don’t like flying under RAOz……..start another association. Oh that’s right, it seems to have crashed and burned. Or you can move over and fly VH and then see how much influence you have on your recreational flying. This is the organisation we have at the moment and we are moving forward under their hand, both paid and volunteer. And to those of you who intimate corruption by the executive and staff, as has crept into these forum discussions …..PUorSU. Ken

I have just completed the above survey to get rid of the stall speed limitation so I can fly my Colt under the RAoz banner. If I may urge all owners and potential owners to respond positively to it. For those who have articulated a reluctance to increase the stall speed, remember, it is NOT COMPULSORY that you alter your aircraft in any way, all will stay ‘as is’ for you. Ken

They are looking to put them in a microlight soon