Jump to content

VH-MKQ Cessna 172 Accident, Agfest, Tasmania


Recommended Posts

http://www.examiner.com.au/story/2250057/aircraft-pilot-loses-control-on-landing-at-agfest/?cs=95

 

Aircraft pilot loses control on landing at Agfest

 

April 30, 2014, 2:30 p.m.

 

 

The upturned Cessna at Agfest this afternoon. Photo by Geoff Robson

 

A light aircraft has come to rest on its roof after its pilot lost control on landing at the Agfest site this afternoon.

 

Emergency services were notified of the incident just before 2pm.

 

The 32-year-old pilot in a Cessna, lost control on landing. The aircraft went through two fences and came to rest upside down.

 

The pilot was not hurt and there were no passengers on board at the time.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I had read that there was going to be 2 aircraft from the Tasmanian Aero Club on display at Agfest, drumming up business for Flying Training.

 

The pilot of VH-MKQ is an experienced G A pilot & a R A instructor.

 

Apparently the grass was wet.

 

An Update from the Examiner

 

ATSB probe into Agfest plane crash

 

By LUCY POSKITT

 

May 1, 2014, 12:15 p.m.

 

 

Photo by Geoff Robson

 

A LIGHT plane crash at Carrick yesterday afternoon will be investigated by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

 

The Cessna crashed shortly before 2pm into a paddock at Quercus Rural Youth Park, the home of Agfest.

 

The Launceston pilot, 32, walked away from the accident.

 

A spokesman for the ATSB said the investigation had started, and would include interviews with the pilot and examining photos of the aircraft.

 

``The aircraft touched down and the pilot applied the brakes, however, the aircraft did not decelerate normally,'' he said.

 

``The aircraft overran the runway, collided with a fence, and the nose landing gear entered a ditch.

 

``The aircraft rolled over and came to rest inverted. The pilot was uninjured and the aircraft was substantially damaged.''

 

The report would be released within several months, the ATSB said.

 

It was previously reported the Civil Aviation Safety Authority would investigate the crash; however, CASA is a regulatory body and will only look at whether any regulatory breaches have occurred after the release of the ATSB report.

 

 

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing beats aerodynamic 'braking' and the old C172 allows for a very low speed arrival if you fly an accurate approach. Brakes are the next resort - but work better when there is weight on the wheels. A groundloop is probably the last resort but needs a lot of courage! Guess we'll now wait years for ATSB to begrudgingly provide any useful info.

 

happy days,

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks in better condition than most GA, just need to flip it and top up the oil and fuel.

Gnu you are a rough operator........ I would at least change the tyres while I was at it, seems too good an opportunity to waste:wink:

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The poor think was probably feeling overawed by all those rough, tough ag-ro types and just wanted its tummy tickled... but that's a pretty amazing forward roll it did there - didn't even dent the spinner!

 

So many small aircraft crashes end up with the thing upside down, it's enough to make one think hard about the level of protection some of the swoopy low-wing types offer against neck compression injuries - not to mention the problems of getting out if they are upside down. Plus, the desirability of five or six point harnesses, even for just recreational flying.

 

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been my observation that far fewer low wings end up inverted. Perhaps the weight of wings and fuel being closer to the ground reduces the overturning moment. Also less likely to tip sideways in a gust and dig in a wingtip. But of course once inverted a good roll cage and a way out is very desirable.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing beats aerodynamic 'braking' and the old C172 allows for a very low speed arrival if you fly an accurate approach. Brakes are the next resort - but work better when there is weight on the wheels. A groundloop is probably the last resort but needs a lot of courage! Guess we'll now wait years for ATSB to begrudgingly provide any useful info.

happy days,

I notice the flaps are still down...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gnu you are a rough operator........ I would at least change the tyres while I was at it, seems too good an opportunity to waste:wink:

Change the tyres??....quite clearly there's nothing wrong with them, unless you feel it might perform better with knobby ones.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change the tyres??....quite clearly there's nothing wrong with them, unless you feel it might perform better with knobby ones.

You've gotta make allowances for SDQDI. He has a tundra tyre fettish.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change the tyres??....quite clearly there's nothing wrong with them, unless you feel it might perform better with knobby ones.

At least with the knobbies, you'd pull up to a dead stop quicker....... but wait, that's where we came in whot?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ozzie

Why are the ATSB doing an investigation on this accident? Shirley a waste of dollars and resources. Pretty straight forward and no one killed or any real property destroyed. Quiet news day for them?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...