bull Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Oh No not another one ,at this rate there will be no more flying to argue about,,,,,,, 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetjr Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Probably back flying by end of next week, its a good reason they are popular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalph Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Oh No not another one ,at this rate there will be no more flying to argue about,,,,,,, What? Tecnams? Nah, still plenty of them around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rankamateur Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Probably back flying by end of next week, its a good reason they are popular. Reports of extensive damage overstated, were they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bull Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Reports of extensive damage overstated, were they? Na they are plastic mate remember,just heat up the blow torch and bend em back into shape lol,,,,,,C,mon all you nobs ,,have a sence of humour,no one was killed and was just flipping off at the jab lovers club as they gather for the annual meeting in the dark back corner of the blue oyster bar,{was cancelled last year because too many could not make it,something about through bolts or something] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bull Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 What? Tecnams? Nah, still plenty of them around. Na heaps of the good old teckys around ,nothing wrong with a good old tinny,just the alloy donks in some ah lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLA82 Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Maybe the should fit them all with ballistic chutes so they can do formation jumps with all the cirrus out there.. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camel Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 Bull , add a " y " to end of Bull and some here can take you a little more serious, that is how I see it , but I'm a Jab owner, but I have owned five aircraft and two have been Jabiru's. Two Rotax powered and one Lycoming. The 912 had lots of exhaust replacement and repairs, the lycoming had a cracked head. They all need maintenance. I will be interested to know the cause of this engine stop. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billwoodmason Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 I know the knockers (FT, Bull, Mick Poole etc) will be disappointed but maybe it wasn't a Jab motor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly_tornado Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 ha, I never tell you this often enough but you got a good sense of humour bill 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man emu Posted November 21, 2015 Share Posted November 21, 2015 What is the real difference between the terms "forced landing" and "crash landing"? To my mind, a "forced landing" is caused by one or more of a. loss of the ability of the airplane to continue normal flying - caused by engine malfunction; fuel exhaustion, or airframe malfunction. b. deterioration of weather conditions to a level below which continued flight towards planned destination, or away from areas of adverse conditions would be unsafe c. incapacitation of crew or passengers which prevents safe operation of the airplane, or rapid access to medical assistance on the ground. A "crash landing" is the impact of an airplane with water or land which results in damage to the airplane, and may result in injury to pilot and passengers. Therefore, a "crash landing" can result from circumstances that would not be considered to have initiated the need for a "forced landing", and a "forced landing" may not result in damage to the airplane or injury to pilot or passengers. OME 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggles Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 ............but maybe it wasn't a Jab motor. I believe you may well be correct Bill ....... Bob 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russ Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 jab powered, non jab powered...............it was a JAB, and that's enough for the tossers to get excited about. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greybeard Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 An Australian designed fibreglass airframe with an (as yet) unknown engine was observed parked in a bent state at a location not normally used as parking spot for aeronautical conveyances.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 Jabs don't bend. They snap into various sized bits if they get sufficient encouragement. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farri Posted December 5, 2015 Share Posted December 5, 2015 What is the real difference between the terms "forced landing" and "crash landing"?OME Geese, OME! Just took a look at who put a like on your post and one was, Maj Millard. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 http://atsb.gov.au/publications/investigation_reports/2015/aair/ao-2015-138.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now