rrogerramjet Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Hi, Leaving capex limitations out of the equation, for now, if these requirements were given which LSA registerable aircraft would you choose? Can be 24 or 19, with VH option a realistic outcome. 1. Tin skin a must have, some use of other materials ok, but definitely no fabrics or mainly/all fibreglass constructions. (perhaps unfairly sidelining Jab 230/430 here, but there's enough info around on them) 2. MTOW >600kg. (possible RA weight increase in the pipeline or VH reg) 3. 75% cruise speed near 120kts, or any number above. (Note: 105kts is not 'near' 120) 3a. Fuel use must be >30L/hr, prefer low 20's 4. Option for VH reg and potential for IFR rating. 5. No RG or turbo to meet above cruise speeds. For my thoughts I'm tossing in RV9, that meets all the above requirements. Others come to mind? Thanks Ramjet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Well if you set a definition of an rv you’re going to get rv as the answer aren’t you? 2 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onetrack Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 One of these would be very nice, if I won 1st Division Lotto. But doesn't quite meet your RV9-style, speed requirement. But 104-111kts isn't too shabby for a classic design from the 1930's. And just look at that seating and upholstery! Luscombe Silvaire Aircraft Company Luscombe Silvaire Aircraft Company Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooperplace Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 I've flown a tecnam P2002 all of once. Low wing, Rotax engine. Lovely aircraft, IMO. Others here will know much more about them. Pricey. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacesailor Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Still!. The poor old "HUMMELBIRD" meets almost all of your requirements. Pity it takes a few years to build one. " "spacesailor 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgwilson Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 You should modify your opening sentence from which LSA registerable" to "which RA registerable". LSA is a specific category and that restricts the choice. Personally I'd choose the aircraft I built (see my Avatar). All aluminium with fibreglass bits like cowl, spats & wing tips, 75% cruise 125-130 knots, stall 32 knots with full flap, 37knots clean, approx 24-26 lph @120knots, MTOW 600kg in RA category of if built under SAAA & VH registered I think 800kg. IFR just depends upon equipment. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris SS Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Once you fly an RV you will be spoilt for anything else. An RV-9 will be good for 150kts on a 160hp motor with a fixed pitch prop, burning 32l/h. You can bring the fuel burn down further if you have fuel injection and run lean of peak on long trips, but the saving in fuel is often not worth the complexity. For my money the RV7 is WAY more fun. It has a lower aspect ratio wing (3 ft narrower span) and when powered by a 180hp motor, will happily spend the day at 160kts, with gentleman’s aeros in between. The only way you’ll get the fuel burn down to early 20s is with a Rotax. There are HUNDREDS of aeroplanes in this playground but I’m not sure that any of them (other than the plastic fantastics - and these have their own issues) will give you much more than 120 kts. If fuel burn is important to you - have a look at the Sling 2 - arguably one of the best light sport aircraft in the world. If you want to have a barrel of fun in an almost limitless aeroplane - RV7! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rrogerramjet Posted January 29, 2018 Author Share Posted January 29, 2018 Well if you set a definition of an rv you’re going to get rv as the answer aren’t you? Yes, but what model? That was the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rrogerramjet Posted January 29, 2018 Author Share Posted January 29, 2018 You should modify your opening sentence from which LSA registerable" to "which RA registerable". LSA is a specific category and that restricts the choice. Personally I'd choose the aircraft I built (see my Avatar). All aluminium with fibreglass bits like cowl, spats & wing tips, 75% cruise 125-130 knots, stall 32 knots with full flap, 37knots clean, approx 24-26 lph @120knots, MTOW 600kg in RA category of if built under SAAA & VH registered I think 800kg. IFR just depends upon equipment. @kgwilson you are absolutely correct, my bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rrogerramjet Posted January 29, 2018 Author Share Posted January 29, 2018 You should modify your opening sentence from which LSA registerable" to "which RA registerable". LSA is a specific category and that restricts the choice.Personally I'd choose the aircraft I built (see my Avatar). All aluminium with fibreglass bits like cowl, spats & wing tips, 75% cruise 125-130 knots, stall 32 knots with full flap, 37knots clean, approx 24-26 lph @120knots, MTOW 600kg in RA category of if built under SAAA & VH registered I think 800kg. IFR just depends upon equipment. I have a workmate who swears by same, he might be looking at selling but I'd want to take the 'J' brand motor out.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rrogerramjet Posted January 29, 2018 Author Share Posted January 29, 2018 Still!.The poor old "HUMMELBIRD" meets almost all of your requirements. Pity it takes a few years to build one. " I will drop the 'old, bold pilot' saying right on top of this clip. I swear I saw a 95degree bankover in there.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bexrbetter Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Thing with the Morgan now is Raytol looks like an improved service and support as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rrogerramjet Posted January 29, 2018 Author Share Posted January 29, 2018 One of these would be very nice, if I won 1st Division Lotto. But doesn't quite meet your RV9-style, speed requirement. But 104-111kts isn't too shabby for a classic design from the 1930's. And just look at that seating and upholstery!Luscombe Silvaire Aircraft Company Luscombe Silvaire Aircraft Company Nice, but fails Q3, even with prior notification! Upholstery wasn't a criteria, but it is blingy. My 2 dogs I have to transit may well pee on it regardless of quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Yes, but what model? That was the question. If you’re limiting it to LSA and vans then you are limited to the rv12 as an E-LSA. If you’re after RAAus registerable airframes then you’ve got more options But as you’ve got the less than sign wrong in two of your limits I doubt you means anything other than asking “What’s better than a vans that’s pretty much the same as a vans” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 But if you want an rv I’d say rv3. 500kg of 45knt stall fun. You never said two seats 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgmwa Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 If you want an RV that is LSA compliant, then an RV-12 is probably your best choice. Register it as ELSA or experimental, whichever you prefer. You can shoehorn an RV-9 (or even a 7 I believe) onto the RAAus register with a 600kg weight limit, but not easily (and maybe not anymore these days either?), and certainly not without some compromise in speed and/or payload. The current RV-12 kits give you a choice of ULS or iS engines. Vans say the iS is significantly more fuel-efficient than the ULS (30% or more). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ivan4ilse Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Hi,Leaving capex limitations out of the equation, for now, if these requirements were given which LSA registerable aircraft would you choose? Can be 24 or 19, with VH option a realistic outcome. 1. Tin skin a must have, some use of other materials ok, but definitely no fabrics or mainly/all fibreglass constructions. (perhaps unfairly sidelining Jab 230/430 here, but there's enough info around on them) 2. MTOW >600kg. (possible RA weight increase in the pipeline or VH reg) 3. 75% cruise speed near 120kts, or any number above. (Note: 105kts is not 'near' 120) 3a. Fuel use must be >30L/hr, prefer low 20's 4. Option for VH reg and potential for IFR rating. 5. No RG or turbo to meet above cruise speeds. For my thoughts I'm tossing in RV9, that meets all the above requirements. Others come to mind? Thanks Ramjet Rans S-21 Outbound, Still in development but has flown.Looks like it could be close to meeting your criteria with the larger engine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgwilson Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 I'd want to take the 'J' brand motor out.... Why? These engines had a bad rap from a few vocal people mainly due to overheating and poor maintenance routines. Unfortunately they had allies within CASA and the limitations debacle ensued. The whole thing was a crock. Their 46 engine failures ended up as 6 & in that year Jab engines had fewer failures than Rotax. There have been problems but also resolutions. All engines fail because they are man made & therefore not perfect. Your choice but base it on fact not emotion. Head over heart. 5 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Why? These engines had a bad rap from a few vocal people mainly due to overheating and poor maintenance routines. Unfortunately they had allies within CASA and the limitations debacle ensued. The whole thing was a crock. Their 46 engine failures ended up as 6 & in that year Jab engines had fewer failures than Rotax. There have been problems but also resolutions. All engines fail because they are man made & therefore not perfect. Your choice but base it on fact not emotion. Head over heart. Well I would have said a J3300 in an rv3 ... get your 500kg and have more load available BUT he excluded the jab engines. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onetrack Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 My 2 dogs I have to transit may well pee on it regardless of quality Well, if you just wanted a bare-bones, high-speed dog-carrier - you could have specified that! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Well, if you just wanted a bare-bones, high-speed dog-carrier - you could have specified that! And if they are messy pups and you have two then Velcro one to each wing (balanced) and I can assure you they’ll be sh1tless when you arrive ... win-win 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Really thin riveted. 16 thou, aluminium skins don't do it for me. . What's with the need to do 150 knots.? You need C/S prop and retracts to do that and you are going to get belted around in turbulence, and the plane design must be quite clean or you are just dragging it along with excess power . No mention of Tailwheel. For a utility plane it's almost a must have. Think you wrote the specs with the answer in mind. You can't get a low wing through a farm gate and you are limited in crosswind with what wing down you can safely use, especially on grass with a bit of growth. Just my contribution. Carbon Cub or Eurofox.. I like a plane with a genuine 8 G+ strength. , so I can chuck it around without the wings coming off (if possible). The Eurofox wouldn't have that but.. It's nice.. Nev 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgwilson Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 What A/C have 16 thou skins? Perhaps the Eropean LSAs to get into their lower weight category. Maybe an elevator, rudder or ailerons but not the wings or fuselage I'd have thought. Mine is 25 thou & thinest bits 20 thou & it feels solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Methusala Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 You're all missing the point about recreational a/c. I know a bloke who has had a load of RV's. All 150kt and look like MM in the shower. He is now considering selling the RV because he has fallen in love with the RECREATIONAL thing and flies a Hornet. Back to the love of flying. If you want to go somewhere the airlines are cheap and you can have a beer! Don 1 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bexrbetter Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 What A/C have 16 thou skins? . Only the World's 3rd most popular (I think, behind Cessna and Vans) light aircraft in modern times, and number one in sub 600kgs, the Zenith range. Speaking of Vans, has the OP looked at the Vans range, maybe there's something there suitable? All 150kt and look like MM in the shower. Marilyn Manson? Ewww.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now