Jump to content

Armidale, NSW


Recommended Posts

Everyone has heard the "those that haven't, will" scenario. Yet I bet that there are heaps (including me) that run the landing drill and there is no problem..

 

How many get the "mixture rich" wrong and the engine won't start.. not a problem cause you are still on the ground but do a second take and they are away..

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are those who have retractables that forgot to lower the gear and those that will...I paid extra for fixed gear for a reason... 10 knots never equals $30000

Tends to be more expensive than that, in a Lancair of that generation, because sliding along the bitumen tends to abrade the wing main spar cap.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on guys, how do you know it wasn't mechanical failure and the pilot couldn't do a thing about it and perhaps should be congratulated for the landing

Because then these pilots couldn't display their intrinsic deeply rooted aviation retractable knowledge and just prefer to jump to conclusions anyway.

 

It WAS mechanical failure.....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any retractable- gear aircraft has the potential for a gear-up landing, for a variety of causes apart from pilot error. What surprises me is that so few of them incorporate a rub-strip or two on their belly*, to reduce the damage; or leave a part of the main wheels extended. But no, they seem to want to retract the gear sideways, and pull it all the way in. The small gain in performance from that, over the way Douglas did it in the DC-3, is important if you are actually in combat, where every ounce of speed counts - or if you are flying a high-altitude spyplane, where the drag may cost a bit of service ceiling. But in a recreational aircraft?

 

* The Boulton-Paul Balliol advanced trainer had a sprung skid incorporated in its fuselage; one of the very few whose designers seem to have thought about this.

 

It reminds me of the pattern of aircraft ownership that emerged amongst well-heeled owners in the '60s - their first aircraft was similar to what they trained on; the second was a retractable, with two engines for the really affluent ones, and the third one was single engine, fixed gear, but with sufficient disposable load to be useful - e.g. Cessna 206 or Cherokee six.

 

One of the things one needs to watch for, in a retractable, is that no fuel drain valves project where they are liable to be damaged in a wheels-up landing. That's a requirement for certificated aircraft.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In reality if you damage the nosewheel on a lighty, it is at least as serious as a wheel up. Most U/L's have a barely strong enough nosewheel to do a minimum job of it, so the plane has to be treated accordingly with the way it is handled. If you make having the gear down an important enough item you are less likely to transgress.. If you forget it, your situational awareness is not up to it, is it? Nev

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dafydd, I'm pretty sure the Sportavia RF-5B Sperber motor gilder was also fitted with a couple if wear strips on the belly. There was one base at my local gliding club several years ago and I recall the strips were used on more than one occasion. The Yak 52 will also run happily on retracted gear, resulting in minor damage to flaps and often the leading edge of a wing will cop a ding from a broken propellor blade.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because then these pilots couldn't display their intrinsic deeply rooted aviation retractable knowledge and just prefer to jump to conclusions anyway.It WAS mechanical failure.....

Don't they have a little wheel to wind the gear down if it fails to function, or does that only work in the movies?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank

 

Iv never seen a fixed gear aircraft land with its wheels up...sure some have done a modification as they landed..

 

But i just couldnt justify the risk of failure by pilot or hardware, for the sake of 10 knots ...

 

Especially given 99 % of our flying is local or short range

 

The hassle of extra maint, extra checks , extra risk just cant be justified in my opinion a recreational aircraft, unless you where regularly commuting or covering long distances..

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^ in the case of the Lancair, you have a dump valve to release the hydraulic pressure holding the gear up and the gear "freefalls" into place (supposed to anyhow).

PA28R has the same system.

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...